Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1585049 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] regulator: remove unnecessary code

Started by"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
First post2017-02-21 06:20 +0100
Last post2017-02-21 18:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] regulator: remove unnecessary code "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-02-21 06:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] regulator: remove unnecessary code Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 18:50 +0100

#1585049 — [PATCH] regulator: remove unnecessary code

From"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Date2017-02-21 06:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH] regulator: remove unnecessary code
Message-ID<tdb1L-6o5-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
So it makes no sense to evaluate it, since the test will always evaluate as
true.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 751412
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
index d029c94..a118f63 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int da9055_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	config.driver_data = regulator;
 	config.regmap = da9055->regmap;
 
-	if (pdata && pdata->regulators) {
+	if (pdata) {
 		config.init_data = pdata->regulators[pdev->id];
 	} else {
 		ret = da9055_regulator_dt_init(pdev, regulator, &config,
-- 
2.5.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1585566

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-02-21 18:50 +0100
Message-ID<tdmJA-5Ph-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1585049

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:17:36PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
> So it makes no sense to evaluate it, since the test will always evaluate as
> true.

> -	if (pdata && pdata->regulators) {
> +	if (pdata) {

This isn't actually helping anything, it just makes the code potentially
less robust if someone changes regulators to be allocated separately.
There's no cost to having the check in the code, the compiler should
notice if it's always true.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web