Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1580140 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] tile: fix build failure

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] tile: fix build failure Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 00:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] tile: fix build failure Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-14 00:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] tile: fix build failure Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-14 09:50 +0100

#1580140 — Re: [PATCH] tile: fix build failure

On Tuesday 24 January 2017 04:56 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 1/24/2017 11:39 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
>>
>> The build of tilegx allmodconfig was failing with errors like:
>> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:5:15: error: unknown type name 'u64'
>>   static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
>>                 ^~~
>> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:5:31: error: unknown type name 'u32'
>>   static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
>>                                 ^~~
>> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:5:38: error: unknown type name 'u32'
>>   static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
>>                                        ^~~
>> In file included from ../fs/ubifs/ubifs.h:26:0,
>>                   from ../fs/ubifs/shrinker.c:42:
>> ../include/linux/math64.h: In function 'mul_u64_u32_shr':
>> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:9:21: error: implicit declaration of
>>     function 'mul_u32_u32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>> The simplest solution was to include the types header file.
>>
>> Fixes: 9e3d6223d209 ("math64, timers: Fix 32bit mul_u64_u32_shr() and
>> friends")
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>>
>> build log is at:
>> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/jobs/194717687
>>
>>   arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
>

linux-next is still failing for this error. Who will pick this up?

Regards
Sudip

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1580141

Hi Sudip,

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:58:40 +0000 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 24 January 2017 04:56 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > On 1/24/2017 11:39 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:  
> >> From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> The build of tilegx allmodconfig was failing with errors like:
> >> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:5:15: error: unknown type name 'u64'
> >>   static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
> >>                 ^~~
> >> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:5:31: error: unknown type name 'u32'
> >>   static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
> >>                                 ^~~
> >> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:5:38: error: unknown type name 'u32'
> >>   static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
> >>                                        ^~~
> >> In file included from ../fs/ubifs/ubifs.h:26:0,
> >>                   from ../fs/ubifs/shrinker.c:42:
> >> ../include/linux/math64.h: In function 'mul_u64_u32_shr':
> >> ../arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h:9:21: error: implicit declaration of
> >>     function 'mul_u32_u32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>
> >> The simplest solution was to include the types header file.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 9e3d6223d209 ("math64, timers: Fix 32bit mul_u64_u32_shr() and
> >> friends")
> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> build log is at:
> >> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/jobs/194717687
> >>
> >>   arch/tile/include/asm/div64.h | 1 +
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)  
> >
> > Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
> >  
> 
> linux-next is still failing for this error. Who will pick this up?

Presumably the tip tree (timers/core).  Added Thomas to cc.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1580400

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > linux-next is still failing for this error. Who will pick this up?
> 
> Presumably the tip tree (timers/core).  Added Thomas to cc.

Applied.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web