Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1579357 > unrolled thread

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2017-02-13 03:30 +0100
Last post2017-02-13 07:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-13 03:30 +0100
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-13 05:40 +0100
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-13 07:50 +0100

#1579357 — Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-02-13 03:30 +0100
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
Message-ID<taeyR-5Ng-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Paul,

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:54:37 -0800 Paul McKenney <paulmckrcu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > net/smc/af_smc.c:102:16: error: 'SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU' undeclared here (not in a function)
> >   .slab_flags = SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
> >                 ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> >   c7a545924ca1 ("mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> >   ac7138746e14 ("smc: establish new socket family")
> >
> > from the net-next tree.
> >
> > I have applied the following merge fix patch (someone will need to
> > remember to mention this to Linus):  
> 
> Thank you, Stephen!  I expect that there might be a bit more
> bikeshedding on the name, but here is hoping...  :-/

The need for this merge fix patch has gone away today.  Is that a
permanent situation, or will it come back?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1579401

From"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2017-02-13 05:40 +0100
Message-ID<tagAF-76E-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579357
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:21:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:54:37 -0800 Paul McKenney <paulmckrcu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > net/smc/af_smc.c:102:16: error: 'SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > >   .slab_flags = SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
> > >                 ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   c7a545924ca1 ("mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU")
> > >
> > > interacting with commit
> > >
> > >   ac7138746e14 ("smc: establish new socket family")
> > >
> > > from the net-next tree.
> > >
> > > I have applied the following merge fix patch (someone will need to
> > > remember to mention this to Linus):  
> > 
> > Thank you, Stephen!  I expect that there might be a bit more
> > bikeshedding on the name, but here is hoping...  :-/
> 
> The need for this merge fix patch has gone away today.  Is that a
> permanent situation, or will it come back?

I chickened out on that commit for this merge window, so it will come
back at -rc1.  But I will cover that when I rebase to -rc1.

							Thanx, Paul

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1579466

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-02-13 07:50 +0100
Message-ID<taiCu-56-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579401
Hi Paul,

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:37:48 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I chickened out on that commit for this merge window, so it will come
> back at -rc1.  But I will cover that when I rebase to -rc1.

OK, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web