Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1580002 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-14 17:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 17:50 +0100
| From | Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator |
| Message-ID | <tauaC-7Oj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 02/13/2017 10:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > >> An other question is: do we have others memory regions that could be interested >> by this new framework ? I have in mind that some title memory regions could use >> it or replace ION heaps (system, carveout, etc...). >> Maybe it only solve CMA allocation issue, in this case there is no need to create >> a new framework but only a dedicated ioctl. > > The software defined networking people seemed to think they had a use > case for this as well. They're not entirely upstream of course but > still... > This is the first I've heard of anything like this. Do you have any more details/reading? Thanks, Laura
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-14 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <taOsF-4e9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1580002 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:01:14AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 02/13/2017 10:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > The software defined networking people seemed to think they had a use > > case for this as well. They're not entirely upstream of course but > > still... > This is the first I've heard of anything like this. Do you have any more > details/reading? No, unfortunately it was in a meeting and I was asking for more details on what specifically the hardware was doing myself. My understanding is that it's very similar to the GPU/video needs.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web