Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1579367 > unrolled thread

Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency'

Started byViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
First post2017-02-13 04:20 +0100
Last post2017-02-13 04:40 +0100
Articles 6 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of  'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-13 04:20 +0100
    Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of  'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency' Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com> - 2017-02-13 04:40 +0100
      Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of  'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency' Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com> - 2017-02-13 04:40 +0100
        Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of  'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-13 05:00 +0100
          Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of  'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency' Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com> - 2017-02-14 03:10 +0100
      Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of  'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-13 04:40 +0100

#1579367 — Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency'

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-02-13 04:20 +0100
SubjectRe: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency'
Message-ID<taflg-6oZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 13-02-17, 03:35, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   1ce42845f987e92eabfc6e026d44d826c25c74a5
> commit: 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675 PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency()
> date:   1 year ago

And we are seeing these bogus reports again :(

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1579371

FromPhilip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Date2017-02-13 04:40 +0100
Message-ID<tafEC-6vS-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579367
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:43:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 13-02-17, 03:35, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head:   1ce42845f987e92eabfc6e026d44d826c25c74a5
> > commit: 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675 PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency()
> > date:   1 year ago
> 
> And we are seeing these bogus reports again :(
thanks for feedback, do you mean this is a wrongly reported issue, like the issue can't
be reproduced or the issue was fixed already?

> 
> -- 
> viresh
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1579379

FromPhilip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Date2017-02-13 04:40 +0100
Message-ID<tafEC-6vS-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579371
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:04:55AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 13-02-17, 11:35, Philip Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:43:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 13-02-17, 03:35, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > head:   1ce42845f987e92eabfc6e026d44d826c25c74a5
> > > > commit: 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675 PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency()
> > > > date:   1 year ago
> > > 
> > > And we are seeing these bogus reports again :(
> > thanks for feedback, do you mean this is a wrongly reported issue, like the issue can't
> > be reproduced or the issue was fixed already?
> 
> Look at the date of the patch above: "1 year ago".
got it, i will check this part to see why reporting on 1 year old commit.

> 
> I have also received 7-8 more mails for the OPP framework and they are all bogus
> as well.
on the other side, this is a build issue from randconfig, looks the failure exists on linus/master
head 1ce4284, and caused by 655c9df commit. Not sure whether you can reproduce it, or if it is not
a real issue, we can further follow up to fix false warning.

> 
> -- 
> viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1579386

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-02-13 05:00 +0100
Message-ID<tafXX-6CA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579379
On 13-02-17, 11:41, Philip Li wrote:
> on the other side, this is a build issue from randconfig, looks the failure exists on linus/master
> head 1ce4284, and caused by 655c9df commit. Not sure whether you can reproduce it, or if it is not
> a real issue, we can further follow up to fix false warning.

I don't think so. This is what your report says:

reproduce:
        git checkout 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64

It never said that you can checkout 1ce4284 and reproduce this.

Can you try to reproduce it on 1ce4284? I am sure you wouldn't find anything.

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1580218

FromPhilip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Date2017-02-14 03:10 +0100
Message-ID<taAJ3-3JR-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579386
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:27:59AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 13-02-17, 11:41, Philip Li wrote:
> > on the other side, this is a build issue from randconfig, looks the failure exists on linus/master
> > head 1ce4284, and caused by 655c9df commit. Not sure whether you can reproduce it, or if it is not
> > a real issue, we can further follow up to fix false warning.
> 
> I don't think so. This is what your report says:
> 
> reproduce:
>         git checkout 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=x86_64
> 
> It never said that you can checkout 1ce4284 and reproduce this.
> 
> Can you try to reproduce it on 1ce4284? I am sure you wouldn't find anything.
ah, it looks like a false reporting, both commits are ok. 

I will follow up to fix this. sorry for inconvenience caused.

> 
> -- 
> viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1579380

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-02-13 04:40 +0100
Message-ID<tafEC-6vS-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1579371
On 13-02-17, 11:35, Philip Li wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:43:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 13-02-17, 03:35, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > head:   1ce42845f987e92eabfc6e026d44d826c25c74a5
> > > commit: 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675 PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency()
> > > date:   1 year ago
> > 
> > And we are seeing these bogus reports again :(
> thanks for feedback, do you mean this is a wrongly reported issue, like the issue can't
> be reproduced or the issue was fixed already?

Look at the date of the patch above: "1 year ago".

I have also received 7-8 more mails for the OPP framework and they are all bogus
as well.

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web