Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1680317 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-03 16:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-04 05:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-07-03 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 05:20 +0200
| From | Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-03 16:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect |
| Message-ID | <tZaPM-2Pz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.xiao@gmail.com wrote: > From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> > > Changelog in v2: > thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if > PML is supported Hi Paolo, Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? Thanks!
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-03 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tZbLP-3s5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1680317 |
On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.xiao@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> >> >> Changelog in v2: >> thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if >> PML is supported > > Hi Paolo, > > Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) > Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first. Thanks for your understanding, Paolo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-04 05:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tZmxz-2vN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1680458 |
On 07/03/2017 11:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> >> >> On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.xiao@gmail.com wrote: >>> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> >>> >>> Changelog in v2: >>> thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if >>> PML is supported >> >> Hi Paolo, >> >> Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) >> Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? > > I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first. > > Thanks for your understanding, Sure, i fully understand, thank you for bearing my push. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web