Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1680642 > unrolled thread

Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-07-04 05:00 +0200

#1680642 — Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Ellerman
>>> <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:02:39 UTC, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>>>> local_irq_enable can cause interrupts to be taken which could
>>>>> take significant amount of processing time. The idle process
>>>>> should set its polling flag before this, so another process that
>>>>> wakes it during this time will not have to send an IPI.
>>>>>
>>>>> Expand the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG coverage to as large as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3fc5ee927ff4ffed6aa2fcd44d2fbf
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> I've applied it too, so I guess I should drop it?
>>
>> Erk sorry. I hadn't heard anything so I picked it up.
>>
>> If you can drop it that would be good, but if not git will probably work
>> it out mostly :)
>
> I've dropped it, no problem.

Thanks.

cheers

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web