Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1677121 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-28 22:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-30 17:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 22:00 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2017-06-29 00:10 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-06-30 14:00 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2017-06-30 17:10 +0200
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 22:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration |
| Message-ID | <tXri2-1Hi-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > My serie shifted by one, so the very first of the serie is therefore missing, > formerly "ALSA: ac97: split out the generic ac97 registers" in > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9398143/, and the shift triggered the > inclusion of the last patch of my tree, ie. yours :) Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get reposted?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-29 00:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration |
| Message-ID | <tXtjQ-Wu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1677121 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> My serie shifted by one, so the very first of the serie is therefore missing, >> formerly "ALSA: ac97: split out the generic ac97 registers" in >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9398143/, and the shift triggered the >> inclusion of the last patch of my tree, ie. yours :) > > Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get > reposted? Hi Mark, The first patch is only moving around a .h file. I was expecting a review before reposting a v3. Cheers. -- Robert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-30 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tY2KB-50c-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1677222 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:03:58AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > > Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get > > reposted? > The first patch is only moving around a .h file. I was expecting a review before > reposting a v3. I can't tell what's in the first patch if you didn't send it.... :( In general it's best to resend for things like this, I know I focus my review on things that can progress as-is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-30 17:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration |
| Message-ID | <tY5Iu-748-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1678723 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:03:58AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > >> > Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get >> > reposted? > >> The first patch is only moving around a .h file. I was expecting a review before >> reposting a v3. > > I can't tell what's in the first patch if you didn't send it.... :( > In general it's best to resend for things like this, I know I focus my > review on things that can progress as-is. OK, no problem, I'll resend a v2 resend in the following hours. Cheers. -- Robert
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web