Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1677121 > unrolled thread

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration

Started byMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
First post2017-06-28 22:00 +0200
Last post2017-06-30 17:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card  unregistration Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 22:00 +0200
    Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2017-06-29 00:10 +0200
      Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card  unregistration Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-06-30 14:00 +0200
        Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2017-06-30 17:10 +0200

#1677121 — Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-28 22:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration
Message-ID<tXri2-1Hi-15@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

> My serie shifted by one, so the very first of the serie is therefore missing,
> formerly "ALSA: ac97: split out the generic ac97 registers" in
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9398143/, and the shift triggered the
> inclusion of the last patch of my tree, ie. yours :)

Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get
reposted?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1677222 — Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration

FromRobert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Date2017-06-29 00:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration
Message-ID<tXtjQ-Wu-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1677121
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> My serie shifted by one, so the very first of the serie is therefore missing,
>> formerly "ALSA: ac97: split out the generic ac97 registers" in
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9398143/, and the shift triggered the
>> inclusion of the last patch of my tree, ie. yours :)
>
> Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get
> reposted?
Hi Mark,

The first patch is only moving around a .h file. I was expecting a review before
reposting a v3.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1678723

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-30 14:00 +0200
Message-ID<tY2KB-50c-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1677222

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:03:58AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> > Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get
> > reposted?

> The first patch is only moving around a .h file. I was expecting a review before
> reposting a v3.

I can't tell what's in the first patch if you didn't send it.... :(
In general it's best to resend for things like this, I know I focus my
review on things that can progress as-is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1678899 — Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration

FromRobert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Date2017-06-30 17:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration
Message-ID<tY5Iu-748-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1678723
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:03:58AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> > Based on the missing first patch I was expecting the series to get
>> > reposted?
>
>> The first patch is only moving around a .h file. I was expecting a review before
>> reposting a v3.
>
> I can't tell what's in the first patch if you didn't send it.... :(
> In general it's best to resend for things like this, I know I focus my
> review on things that can progress as-is.
OK, no problem, I'll resend a v2 resend in the following hours.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web