Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1676240 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] PM / Domains: Bunch of small improvements and fixes

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] PM / Domains: Bunch of small improvements and fixes "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-28 01:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] PM / Domains: Bunch of small improvements and  fixes Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 16:50 +0200

#1676240 — Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] PM / Domains: Bunch of small improvements and fixes

On Monday, June 12, 2017 05:17:40 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Changes since v1:
> =================
> 1. Patch 2/8: Follow Ulf's advice and use genpd_lookup_dev() which also
>    solves risk of calling this for non-genpd (thus I added Ulf's
>    Reported-by).
> 
> Description:
> ============
> Except adding lockdep assert to domains list mutex (3/8), all patches
> are independent.  Including the fixes for unsafe loop iteration.
> 
> The last patch is RFC as this brings small overhead.

I've applied the [1/8] from this set, but I realize that some other patches in
it have been ACKed by Ulf, so can you please resend those with the tags?

Unless, of course, they depend on the ones that have not been ACKed still.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1676735 — Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] PM / Domains: Bunch of small improvements and fixes

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:51:45AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, June 12, 2017 05:17:40 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > =================
> > 1. Patch 2/8: Follow Ulf's advice and use genpd_lookup_dev() which also
> >    solves risk of calling this for non-genpd (thus I added Ulf's
> >    Reported-by).
> > 
> > Description:
> > ============
> > Except adding lockdep assert to domains list mutex (3/8), all patches
> > are independent.  Including the fixes for unsafe loop iteration.
> > 
> > The last patch is RFC as this brings small overhead.
> 
> I've applied the [1/8] from this set, but I realize that some other patches in
> it have been ACKed by Ulf, so can you please resend those with the tags?
> 
> Unless, of course, they depend on the ones that have not been ACKed still.

Sure, I'll re-spin with acks.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web