Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1676573 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation

Started byDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
First post2017-06-28 13:50 +0200
Last post2017-06-28 13:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-06-28 13:50 +0200

#1676573 — [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2017-06-28 13:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation
Message-ID<tXjDP-6i4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
continue_at() doesn't have a return statement anymore.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
index 1ec84ca81146..295b7e43f92c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
@@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ static inline void closure_wake_up(struct closure_waitlist *list)
  * been dropped with closure_put()), it will resume execution at @fn running out
  * of @wq (or, if @wq is NULL, @fn will be called by closure_put() directly).
  *
- * NOTE: This macro expands to a return in the calling function!
- *
  * This is because after calling continue_at() you no longer have a ref on @cl,
  * and whatever @cl owns may be freed out from under you - a running closure fn
  * has a ref on its own closure which continue_at() drops.
@@ -340,8 +338,6 @@ do {									\
  * Causes @fn to be executed out of @cl, in @wq context (or called directly if
  * @wq is NULL).
  *
- * NOTE: like continue_at(), this macro expands to a return in the caller!
- *
  * The ref the caller of continue_at_nobarrier() had on @cl is now owned by @fn,
  * thus it's not safe to touch anything protected by @cl after a
  * continue_at_nobarrier().

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web