Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1676407 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] spin loop primitives for busy waiting

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] spin loop primitives for busy waiting Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-06-28 08:40 +0200

#1676407 — Re: [PATCH v2] spin loop primitives for busy waiting

Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:

> Current busy-wait loops are implemented by repeatedly calling cpu_relax()
> to give an arch option for a low-latency option to improve power and/or
> SMT resource contention.
>
> This poses some difficulties for powerpc, which has SMT priority setting
> instructions (priorities determine how ifetch cycles are apportioned).
> powerpc's cpu_relax() is implemented by setting a low priority then
> setting normal priority. This has several problems:
>
>  - Changing thread priority can have some execution cost and potential
>    impact to other threads in the core. It's inefficient to execute them
>    every time around a busy-wait loop.
>
>  - Depending on implementation details, a `low ; medium` sequence may
>    not have much if any affect. Some software with similar pattern
>    actually inserts a lot of nops between, in order to cause a few fetch
>    cycles with the low priority.
>
>  - The busy-wait loop runs with regular priority. This might only be a few
>    fetch cycles, but if there are several threads running such loops, they
>    could cause a noticable impact on a non-idle thread.
>
> Implement spin_begin, spin_end primitives that can be used around busy
> wait loops, which default to no-ops. And spin_cpu_relax which defaults to
> cpu_relax.
>
> This will allow architectures to hook the entry and exit of busy-wait
> loops, and will allow powerpc to set low SMT priority at entry, and
> normal priority at exit.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Since last time:
> - Fixed spin_do_cond with initial test as suggested by Linus.
> - Renamed it to spin_until_cond, which reads a little better.
>
>  include/linux/processor.h | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/processor.h

I'm gonna merge this via the powerpc tree unless anyone objects.

cheers

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web