Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1676402 > unrolled thread

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the random tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2017-06-28 08:10 +0200
Last post2017-06-29 23:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the  random tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-28 08:10 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the  random tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-29 23:10 +0200

#1676402 — Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the random tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-06-28 08:10 +0200
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the random tree
Message-ID<tXekO-3ac-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Andrew,

[Yes, top posting :-)]

With the merge window approaching, just a reminder that this conflict
still exists.

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:28:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/random.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   60473a13020f ("random: add get_random_{bytes,u32,u64,int,long,once}_wait family")
> 
> from the random tree and commit:
> 
>   d7802aa82f66 ("random,stackprotect: introduce get_random_canary function")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc include/linux/random.h
> index 4aecc339558d,1fa0dc880bd7..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/random.h
> +++ b/include/linux/random.h
> @@@ -58,31 -57,27 +58,52 @@@ static inline unsigned long get_random_
>   #endif
>   }
>   
>  +/* Calls wait_for_random_bytes() and then calls get_random_bytes(buf, nbytes).
>  + * Returns the result of the call to wait_for_random_bytes. */
>  +static inline int get_random_bytes_wait(void *buf, int nbytes)
>  +{
>  +	int ret = wait_for_random_bytes();
>  +	if (unlikely(ret))
>  +		return ret;
>  +	get_random_bytes(buf, nbytes);
>  +	return 0;
>  +}
>  +
>  +#define declare_get_random_var_wait(var) \
>  +	static inline int get_random_ ## var ## _wait(var *out) { \
>  +		int ret = wait_for_random_bytes(); \
>  +		if (unlikely(ret)) \
>  +			return ret; \
>  +		*out = get_random_ ## var(); \
>  +		return 0; \
>  +	}
>  +declare_get_random_var_wait(u32)
>  +declare_get_random_var_wait(u64)
>  +declare_get_random_var_wait(int)
>  +declare_get_random_var_wait(long)
>  +#undef declare_get_random_var
>  +
> + /*
> +  * On 64-bit architectures, protect against non-terminated C string overflows
> +  * by zeroing out the first byte of the canary; this leaves 56 bits of entropy.
> +  */
> + #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + # ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
> + #  define CANARY_MASK 0xffffffffffffff00UL
> + # else /* big endian, 64 bits: */
> + #  define CANARY_MASK 0x00ffffffffffffffUL
> + # endif
> + #else /* 32 bits: */
> + # define CANARY_MASK 0xffffffffUL
> + #endif
> + 
> + static inline unsigned long get_random_canary(void)
> + {
> + 	unsigned long val = get_random_long();
> + 
> + 	return val & CANARY_MASK;
> + }
> + 
>   unsigned long randomize_page(unsigned long start, unsigned long range);
>   
>   u32 prandom_u32(void);

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1678199

FromAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date2017-06-29 23:10 +0200
Message-ID<tXORj-4sl-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1676402
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:03:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> [Yes, top posting :-)]
> 
> With the merge window approaching, just a reminder that this conflict
> still exists.

huh, it was only a teeny thing.

I moved 

randomstackprotect-introduce-get_random_canary-function.patch
forkrandom-use-get_random_canary-to-set-tsk-stack_canary.patch
x86-ascii-armor-the-x86_64-boot-init-stack-canary.patch
arm64-ascii-armor-the-arm64-boot-init-stack-canary.patch
sh64-ascii-armor-the-sh64-boot-init-stack-canary.patch

to be post-linux-next and refreshed, so it should be good now.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web