Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1677815 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 4.4 37/46] r8152: re-schedule napi for tx

Started byBen Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
First post2017-06-29 16:30 +0200
Last post2017-06-29 16:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 4.4 37/46] r8152: re-schedule napi for tx Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> - 2017-06-29 16:30 +0200

#1677815 — Re: [PATCH 4.4 37/46] r8152: re-schedule napi for tx

FromBen Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Date2017-06-29 16:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.4 37/46] r8152: re-schedule napi for tx
Message-ID<tXICg-eR-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 19:52 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: hayeswang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
> 
> 
> [ Upstream commit 248b213ad908b88db15941202ef7cb7eb137c1a0 ]
> 
> Re-schedule napi after napi_complete() for tx, if it is necessay.
> 
> In r8152_poll(), if the tx is completed after tx_bottom() and before
> napi_complete(), the scheduling of napi would be lost. Then, no
> one handles the next tx until the next napi_schedule() is called.
[...]

This (and other) tests of list_empty() aren't going to be reliable
unless you take the same spinlock used when enqueueing packets.
Alternately you could count packets added and removed from the driver
internal queues and then you should only need memory barriers for
synchronisation when comparing counters.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web