Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1676024 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-29 20:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-06-29 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: ensure memblock-limit is pmd-aligned Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 20:00 +0200
| From | Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned |
| Message-ID | <tX2D0-3Ko-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The pmd containing memblock_limit is cleared by prepare_page_table()
which creates the opportunity for early_alloc() to allocate unmapped
memory if memblock_limit is not pmd aligned causing a boot-time hang.
Commit 965278dcb8ab ("ARM: 8356/1: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM")
attempted to resolve this problem, but there is a path through the
adjust_lowmem_bounds() routine where if all memory regions start and
end on pmd-aligned addresses the memblock_limit will be set to
arm_lowmem_limit.
Since arm_lowmem_limit can be affected by the vmalloc early parameter,
the value of arm_lowmem_limit may not be pmd-aligned. This commit
corrects this oversight such that memblock_limit is always rounded
down to pmd-alignment.
Fixes: 965278dcb8ab ("ARM: 8356/1: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM")
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
Changes for v2:
- Cleaner equivalent implementation suggested by Mark Rutland
- Revised description to better capture the history
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 31af3cb59a60..e46a6a446cdd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -1218,15 +1218,15 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
+ if (!memblock_limit)
+ memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
+
/*
* Round the memblock limit down to a pmd size. This
* helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the
* last full pmd, which should be mapped.
*/
- if (memblock_limit)
- memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
- if (!memblock_limit)
- memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
+ memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) {
if (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > arm_lowmem_limit) {
--
2.13.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-29 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tXFEm-6Sq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1676024 |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:33:29AM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> The pmd containing memblock_limit is cleared by prepare_page_table()
> which creates the opportunity for early_alloc() to allocate unmapped
> memory if memblock_limit is not pmd aligned causing a boot-time hang.
>
> Commit 965278dcb8ab ("ARM: 8356/1: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM")
> attempted to resolve this problem, but there is a path through the
> adjust_lowmem_bounds() routine where if all memory regions start and
> end on pmd-aligned addresses the memblock_limit will be set to
> arm_lowmem_limit.
>
> Since arm_lowmem_limit can be affected by the vmalloc early parameter,
> the value of arm_lowmem_limit may not be pmd-aligned. This commit
> corrects this oversight such that memblock_limit is always rounded
> down to pmd-alignment.
>
> Fixes: 965278dcb8ab ("ARM: 8356/1: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM")
> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
As a minor nit, it would be better for the title to be something like
"ARM: ensure memblock-limit is pmd-aligned", but either way:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Assuming Russell doesn't have any furhter comments, this looks good to
drop into the patch system. See:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
... for instructions on how to send patches there.
Thanks,
Mark.
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Cleaner equivalent implementation suggested by Mark Rutland
> - Revised description to better capture the history
>
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 31af3cb59a60..e46a6a446cdd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1218,15 +1218,15 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
>
> high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
>
> + if (!memblock_limit)
> + memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> +
> /*
> * Round the memblock limit down to a pmd size. This
> * helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the
> * last full pmd, which should be mapped.
> */
> - if (memblock_limit)
> - memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
> - if (!memblock_limit)
> - memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> + memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) {
> if (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > arm_lowmem_limit) {
> --
> 2.13.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-29 20:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: ensure memblock-limit is pmd-aligned |
| Message-ID | <tXLTr-2de-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1677616 |
On 06/29/2017 04:16 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:33:29AM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
>> The pmd containing memblock_limit is cleared by prepare_page_table()
>> which creates the opportunity for early_alloc() to allocate unmapped
>> memory if memblock_limit is not pmd aligned causing a boot-time hang.
>>
>> Commit 965278dcb8ab ("ARM: 8356/1: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM")
>> attempted to resolve this problem, but there is a path through the
>> adjust_lowmem_bounds() routine where if all memory regions start and
>> end on pmd-aligned addresses the memblock_limit will be set to
>> arm_lowmem_limit.
>>
>> Since arm_lowmem_limit can be affected by the vmalloc early parameter,
>> the value of arm_lowmem_limit may not be pmd-aligned. This commit
>> corrects this oversight such that memblock_limit is always rounded
>> down to pmd-alignment.
>>
>> Fixes: 965278dcb8ab ("ARM: 8356/1: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM")
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> As a minor nit, it would be better for the title to be something like
> "ARM: ensure memblock-limit is pmd-aligned", but either way:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> Assuming Russell doesn't have any furhter comments, this looks good to
> drop into the patch system. See:
>
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
>
> ... for instructions on how to send patches there.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
I modified the title as suggested and it has been submitted as 8685/1.
Thanks!
>> ---
>> Changes for v2:
>> - Cleaner equivalent implementation suggested by Mark Rutland
>> - Revised description to better capture the history
>>
>> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>> index 31af3cb59a60..e46a6a446cdd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1218,15 +1218,15 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
>>
>> high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
>>
>> + if (!memblock_limit)
>> + memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Round the memblock limit down to a pmd size. This
>> * helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the
>> * last full pmd, which should be mapped.
>> */
>> - if (memblock_limit)
>> - memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
>> - if (!memblock_limit)
>> - memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
>> + memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
>>
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) {
>> if (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > arm_lowmem_limit) {
>> --
>> 2.13.0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web