Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1675584 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2017-06-27 13:40 +0200
Last post2017-06-27 16:20 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking  for asm goto support Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-27 13:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking  for asm goto support "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com> - 2017-06-27 15:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking  for asm goto support Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-27 16:20 +0200

#1675584 — Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-06-27 13:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support
Message-ID<tWX0C-8iz-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@google.com>
> > 
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ]
> 
> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in
> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4.
> Backport the fix too, please.
> 
> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not
> break anything there, AFAICS.

Thanks for letting me know, now queued up.

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1675715

From"Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Date2017-06-27 15:50 +0200
Message-ID<tWZ2q-1ch-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1675584
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> >
>> > ------------------
>> >
>> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@google.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ]
>>
>> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in
>> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4.
>> Backport the fix too, please.
>>
>> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not
>> break anything there, AFAICS.
>
>Thanks for letting me know, now queued up.

Hey Greg,

I've also queued this up in the pull request I sent a few days ago, you'll
end up seeing a conflict when you look at that branch.

-- 

Thanks,
Sasha

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1675734

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-06-27 16:20 +0200
Message-ID<tWZvr-1FM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1675715
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:44:06PM +0000, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >> >
> >> > ------------------
> >> >
> >> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@google.com>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ]
> >>
> >> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in
> >> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4.
> >> Backport the fix too, please.
> >>
> >> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not
> >> break anything there, AFAICS.
> >
> >Thanks for letting me know, now queued up.
> 
> Hey Greg,
> 
> I've also queued this up in the pull request I sent a few days ago, you'll
> end up seeing a conflict when you look at that branch.

Not a problem, when I merge yours in, I take them as individual patches,
which allows me to drop them easily for stuff like this.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web