Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1675584 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-27 13:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-27 16:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-27 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com> - 2017-06-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-27 16:20 +0200
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 13:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support |
| Message-ID | <tWX0C-8iz-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: David Lin <dtwlin@google.com> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ] > > This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in > 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4. > Backport the fix too, please. > > As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not > break anything there, AFAICS. Thanks for letting me know, now queued up. greg k-h
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWZ2q-1ch-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1675584 |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> > >> > ------------------ >> > >> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@google.com> >> > >> > >> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ] >> >> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in >> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4. >> Backport the fix too, please. >> >> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not >> break anything there, AFAICS. > >Thanks for letting me know, now queued up. Hey Greg, I've also queued this up in the pull request I sent a few days ago, you'll end up seeing a conflict when you look at that branch. -- Thanks, Sasha
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWZvr-1FM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1675715 |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:44:06PM +0000, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > >> > > >> > ------------------ > >> > > >> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@google.com> > >> > > >> > > >> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ] > >> > >> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in > >> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4. > >> Backport the fix too, please. > >> > >> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not > >> break anything there, AFAICS. > > > >Thanks for letting me know, now queued up. > > Hey Greg, > > I've also queued this up in the pull request I sent a few days ago, you'll > end up seeing a conflict when you look at that branch. Not a problem, when I merge yours in, I take them as individual patches, which allows me to drop them easily for stuff like this. thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web