Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1672098 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd

Started byNitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
First post2017-06-22 00:00 +0200
Last post2017-06-22 16:50 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> - 2017-06-22 00:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 13:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> - 2017-06-22 16:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:50 +0200

#1672098 — [PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd

FromNitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
Date2017-06-22 00:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH] sparc64: Fix gup_huge_pmd
Message-ID<tUVPk-3BI-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
The function assumes that each PMD points to head of a
huge page. This is not correct as a PMD can point to
start of any 8M region with a, say 256M, hugepage. The
fix ensures that it points to the correct head of any PMD
huge page.

Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/gup.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
index cd0e32b..9116a6f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr,
 	refs = 0;
 	head = pmd_page(pmd);
 	page = head + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+	if (PageTail(head))
+		head = compound_head(head);
 	do {
 		VM_BUG_ON(compound_head(page) != head);
 		pages[*nr] = page;
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1672526

FromJulian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-22 13:00 +0200
Message-ID<tV809-3zb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1672098
Hi Nitin,

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> wrote:
> The function assumes that each PMD points to head of a
> huge page. This is not correct as a PMD can point to
> start of any 8M region with a, say 256M, hugepage. The
> fix ensures that it points to the correct head of any PMD
> huge page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/sparc/mm/gup.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
> index cd0e32b..9116a6f 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr,
>         refs = 0;
>         head = pmd_page(pmd);
>         page = head + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +       if (PageTail(head))
> +               head = compound_head(head);

Stupid question: shouldn't this go before the page calculation?

>         do {
>                 VM_BUG_ON(compound_head(page) != head);
>                 pages[*nr] = page;

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1672696

FromNitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
Date2017-06-22 16:40 +0200
Message-ID<tVbr4-5Yi-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1672526
Hi Julian,


On 6/22/17 3:53 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> wrote:
>> The function assumes that each PMD points to head of a
>> huge page. This is not correct as a PMD can point to
>> start of any 8M region with a, say 256M, hugepage. The
>> fix ensures that it points to the correct head of any PMD
>> huge page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/sparc/mm/gup.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
>> index cd0e32b..9116a6f 100644
>> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr,
>>          refs = 0;
>>          head = pmd_page(pmd);
>>          page = head + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +       if (PageTail(head))
>> +               head = compound_head(head);
> Stupid question: shouldn't this go before the page calculation?

No, it should be after page calculation: First, 'head' points to base of
the PMD page, then 'page' points to an offset within that page. Finally,
we make sure that head variable points to head of the compound page
which contains the addr.

I think confusion comes from the use of 'head' for pointing to a
non-head page. So, maybe it would be more clear to write that part
of the function this way:

         page = pmd_page(pmd) + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
	head = compound_head(page);

Thanks,
Nitin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1672702

FromJulian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-22 16:50 +0200
Message-ID<tVbAK-62K-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1672696
Hi Nitin,

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
>
> On 6/22/17 3:53 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The function assumes that each PMD points to head of a
>>> huge page. This is not correct as a PMD can point to
>>> start of any 8M region with a, say 256M, hugepage. The
>>> fix ensures that it points to the correct head of any PMD
>>> huge page.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/sparc/mm/gup.c | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
>>> index cd0e32b..9116a6f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
>>> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c
>>> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd,
>>> unsigned long addr,
>>>          refs = 0;
>>>          head = pmd_page(pmd);
>>>          page = head + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>>> +       if (PageTail(head))
>>> +               head = compound_head(head);
>>
>> Stupid question: shouldn't this go before the page calculation?
>
>
> No, it should be after page calculation: First, 'head' points to base of
> the PMD page, then 'page' points to an offset within that page. Finally,
> we make sure that head variable points to head of the compound page
> which contains the addr.

Thanks for the explanation, that makes a bit more sense to me.

> I think confusion comes from the use of 'head' for pointing to a
> non-head page. So, maybe it would be more clear to write that part
> of the function this way:
>
>         page = pmd_page(pmd) + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>         head = compound_head(page);

More verbose variable names would help too. =)

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web