Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1672046 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-21 23:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-22 04:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 18/32] ext4: retry storing value in external inode with xattr block too Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-06-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 18/32] ext4: retry storing value in external inode with xattr block too Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2017-06-22 04:30 +0200
| From | Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 18/32] ext4: retry storing value in external inode with xattr block too |
| Message-ID | <tUVmi-3od-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it
doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to
store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline
area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block.
This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the
sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
---
v2: fix checkpatch.pl warning about indented retry_inode: label
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index dcf7ec98f138..0dfae3f8e209 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -911,11 +911,6 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
int in_inode = i->in_inode;
int rc;
- if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) &&
- (EXT4_XATTR_SIZE(i->value_len) >
- EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(inode->i_sb->s_blocksize)))
- in_inode = 1;
-
/* Compute min_offs and last. */
last = s->first;
for (; !IS_LAST_ENTRY(last); last = EXT4_XATTR_NEXT(last)) {
@@ -1097,7 +1092,8 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
{
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct buffer_head *new_bh = NULL;
- struct ext4_xattr_search *s = &bs->s;
+ struct ext4_xattr_search s_copy = bs->s;
+ struct ext4_xattr_search *s = &s_copy;
struct mb_cache_entry *ce = NULL;
int error = 0;
struct mb_cache *ext4_mb_cache = EXT4_GET_MB_CACHE(inode);
@@ -1519,6 +1515,11 @@ ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, int name_index,
if (!bs.s.not_found && ext4_xattr_value_same(&bs.s, &i))
goto cleanup;
+ if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) &&
+ (EXT4_XATTR_SIZE(i.value_len) >
+ EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(inode->i_sb->s_blocksize)))
+ i.in_inode = 1;
+retry_inode:
error = ext4_xattr_ibody_set(handle, inode, &i, &is);
if (!error && !bs.s.not_found) {
i.value = NULL;
@@ -1530,20 +1531,20 @@ ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, int name_index,
goto cleanup;
}
error = ext4_xattr_block_set(handle, inode, &i, &bs);
- if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) &&
- error == -ENOSPC) {
- /* xattr not fit to block, store at external
- * inode */
- i.in_inode = 1;
- error = ext4_xattr_ibody_set(handle, inode,
- &i, &is);
- }
- if (error)
- goto cleanup;
- if (!is.s.not_found) {
+ if (!error && !is.s.not_found) {
i.value = NULL;
error = ext4_xattr_ibody_set(handle, inode, &i,
&is);
+ } else if (error == -ENOSPC) {
+ /*
+ * Xattr does not fit in the block, store at
+ * external inode if possible.
+ */
+ if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) &&
+ !i.in_inode) {
+ i.in_inode = 1;
+ goto retry_inode;
+ }
}
}
}
--
2.13.1.611.g7e3b11ae1-goog
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-22 04:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 18/32] ext4: retry storing value in external inode with xattr block too |
| Message-ID | <tV02C-6I7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1672046 |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 02:21:28PM -0700, Tahsin Erdogan wrote: > When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it > doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to > store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline > area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block. > > This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the > sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode. > > Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Thanks, added to the ext4 patch queue. - Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web