Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1670658 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFT 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix invalid register offset used for Exynos5433 external interrupts

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [RFT 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix invalid register offset used  for Exynos5433 external interrupts Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> - 2017-06-20 12:40 +0200

#1670658 — Re: [RFT 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix invalid register offset used for Exynos5433 external interrupts

On 06/14/2017 03:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> When setting the pin function for external interrupts, the driver used
> wrong IO memory address base.  The pin function register is always under
> pctl_base, not the eint_base.
> 
> By updating wrong register, the external interrupts for chosen GPIO
> would not work at all and some other GPIO might be configured to wrong
> value.
> 
> Platforms other than Exynos5433 should not be affected as eint_base
> equals pctl_base in such case.
> 
> Fixes: 8b1bd11c1f8f ("pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple 
> IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank")
> Cc:<stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzk@kernel.org>

I've tested this patch by comparing GPFx_CON register values, as 
nothing seems to be currently using pins from the GPF1...GPF5 banks 
as external interrupts on TM2, the only board based on Exynos5433.
I changed sii8620 interrupt-parent temporarily to &gpf1 and GPF1_CON
got configured properly with the patch and improperly without 
the patch. I guess this can be considered as

Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Sylwester

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web