Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1670013 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-06-20 00:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-06-20 01:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-06-20 08:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-06-20 11:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-06-20 11:30 +0200

#1670013 — Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/268] 3.10.107-stable review

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.107 release.
> All patches will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any
> issue with these being applied, please let me know. If anyone thinks some
> important patches are missing and should be added prior to the release,
> please report them quickly with their respective mainline commit IDs.
> 
> Note, I don't have anything important in my queue anymore, so if you
> think something is missing, please send me the upstream commit ID CCing
> the patch's author so that I queue it for .108.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Jun 22 20:24:07 CEST 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late. If someone
> wants a bit more time for a deeper review, please let me know.
> 

Build results:
	total: 121 pass: 118 fail: 3
Failed builds:
	arm:at91_dt_defconfig
	arm:sama5_defconfig
	s390:defconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 83 pass: 82 fail: 1
Failed tests:
	s390:defconfig

Failures:

arm:

drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c: In function 'atmel_flush_buffer':
drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c:1097:24: error: 'struct atmel_uart_port' has no member named 'sg_tx'

s390:

arch/s390/mm/mmap.c: In function 's390_mmap_check':
arch/s390/mm/mmap.c:108:27: error: 'TASK_MAX_SIZE' undeclared

[several of those, in several files]

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1670018

Hi Guenter,

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:46:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Build results:
> 	total: 121 pass: 118 fail: 3
> Failed builds:
> 	arm:at91_dt_defconfig
> 	arm:sama5_defconfig
> 	s390:defconfig
> 
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 83 pass: 82 fail: 1
> Failed tests:
> 	s390:defconfig
> 
> Failures:
> 
> arm:
> 
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c: In function 'atmel_flush_buffer':
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c:1097:24: error: 'struct atmel_uart_port' has no member named 'sg_tx'

OK I see which one it is (219/268), I'll drop it.

> s390:
> 
> arch/s390/mm/mmap.c: In function 's390_mmap_check':
> arch/s390/mm/mmap.c:108:27: error: 'TASK_MAX_SIZE' undeclared

Ah bad I already fixed another one in .106 but this one escaped,
it comes from 166/268, I'll fix it.

thanks a lot!
Willy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1670314

Hi Guenter,

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:51:46AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:46:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 121 pass: 118 fail: 3
> > Failed builds:
> > 	arm:at91_dt_defconfig
> > 	arm:sama5_defconfig
> > 	s390:defconfig
> > 
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 83 pass: 82 fail: 1
> > Failed tests:
> > 	s390:defconfig
> > 
> > Failures:
> > 
> > arm:
> > 
> > drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c: In function 'atmel_flush_buffer':
> > drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c:1097:24: error: 'struct atmel_uart_port' has no member named 'sg_tx'
> 
> OK I see which one it is (219/268), I'll drop it.
> 
> > s390:
> > 
> > arch/s390/mm/mmap.c: In function 's390_mmap_check':
> > arch/s390/mm/mmap.c:108:27: error: 'TASK_MAX_SIZE' undeclared
> 
> Ah bad I already fixed another one in .106 but this one escaped,
> it comes from 166/268, I'll fix it.

So the queue should be fixed now.

Thanks!
Willy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1670504

On 06/19/2017 11:17 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:51:46AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:46:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Build results:
>>> 	total: 121 pass: 118 fail: 3
>>> Failed builds:
>>> 	arm:at91_dt_defconfig
>>> 	arm:sama5_defconfig
>>> 	s390:defconfig
>>>
>>> Qemu test results:
>>> 	total: 83 pass: 82 fail: 1
>>> Failed tests:
>>> 	s390:defconfig
>>>
>>> Failures:
>>>
>>> arm:
>>>
>>> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c: In function 'atmel_flush_buffer':
>>> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c:1097:24: error: 'struct atmel_uart_port' has no member named 'sg_tx'
>>
>> OK I see which one it is (219/268), I'll drop it.
>>
>>> s390:
>>>
>>> arch/s390/mm/mmap.c: In function 's390_mmap_check':
>>> arch/s390/mm/mmap.c:108:27: error: 'TASK_MAX_SIZE' undeclared
>>
>> Ah bad I already fixed another one in .106 but this one escaped,
>> it comes from 166/268, I'll fix it.
> 
> So the queue should be fixed now.
> 

Confirmed. All builds and qemu tests passed with v3.10.106-267-g4242a2a.

Guenter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1670524

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:10:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Confirmed. All builds and qemu tests passed with v3.10.106-267-g4242a2a.

Nice, thank you Guenter!
Willy

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web