Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1671676 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K

Started byThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
First post2017-06-21 15:40 +0200
Last post2017-06-21 18:40 +0200
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-21 15:40 +0200
    [PATCH v5 3/6] irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-21 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada  7K/8K Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-06-21 17:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada  7K/8K Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada  7K/8K Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-21 18:40 +0200

#1671676 — [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K

FromThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-06-21 15:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K
Message-ID<tUNRL-6Ci-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello,

The Marvell Armada 7K/8K SoCs are composed of two parts: the AP (which
contains the CPU cores) and the CP (which contains most
peripherals). The 7K SoCs have one CP, while the 8K SoCs have two CPs,
doubling the number of available peripherals.

In terms of interrupt handling, all devices in the CPs are connected
through wired interrupt to a unit called ICU located in each CP. This
unit converts the wired interrupts from the devices into memory
transactions.

Inside the AP, there is a GIC extension called GICP, which allows a
memory write transaction to trigger a GIC SPI interrupt. The ICUs in
each CP are therefore configured to trigger a memory write into the
appropriate GICP register so that a wired interrupt from a CP device
is converted into a memory write, itself converted into a regular GIC
SPI interrupt.

Until now, the configuration of the ICU was done statically by the
firmware, and therefore the Device Tree files in Linux were specifying
directly GIC interrupts for the interrupts of CP devices. However,
with the growing number of devices in the CP, a static allocation
scheme doesn't work for the long term.

This patch series therefore makes Linux aware of the ICU: GIC SPI
interrupts are dynamically allocated, and the ICU is configured
accordingly to route a CP wired interrupt to the allocated GIC SPI
interrupt.

In detail:

 - The first two patches are the Device Tree binding patches

 - The third patch adds a driver for the GICP.

 - The fourth patch adds the driver for the ICU.

 - The fifth patch adjust Kconfig.platforms to select the GICP and ICU
   drivers.

 - The last patch adjusts the Device Tree files of the Armada 7K/8K to
   describe and use the GICP/ICU.

Changes since v4:

 - Add Acked-by from Marc Zyngier on PATCH 5/6.

 - Add Reviewed-by from Marc Zyngier on PATCH 3/6 and 4/6.

 - Also test msg->address_hi in ->write_msg()
   implementation. Suggested by Marc Zyngier.

 - Use irq_domain_get_of_node() to retrieve the device_node of the MSI
   domain. Suggested by Marc Zyngier.

 - In order to avoid a build dependency between the Device Tree
   changes and the driver changes, the DT were changed to temporarily
   not use the <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h>
   include. Instead, we define ICU_GRP_NSR in the two .dtsi files
   where it is needed. This can be changed during the next kernel
   release.

Changes since v3:

 - Change the API between the ICU and the GICP driver to a single
   function "int mvebu_gicp_get_doorbells(struct device_node *dn,
   phys_addr_t *setspi, phys_addr_t *clrspi). This allows the ICU
   driver to retrieve the physical addresses of the doorbell registers
   of the GICP. This API was suggested by Marc Zyngier.

 - Remove a useless "*hwirq < 0" check, since hwirq is an unsigned
   long pointer.

 - Remove a bogus "put_device()" in the ICU error path. This is no
   longer needed, since we are no longer doing a get_device() on the
   GICP. It was a bug already present in the v3.

Changes since v2:

 - Major rework of the GICP/ICU interaction, as suggested by Marc
   Zyngier. Now the GICP acts as a proper MSI controller, and the ICU
   driver is a consumer of MSIs provided by the GICP.

   Therefore, the GICP now has a "msi-controller" property in the
   Device Tree, stating it is a provider of MSIs, while the ICUs have
   a "msi-parent" property pointing to the GICP, so that they allocate
   MSIs from the GICP.

   The only remaining non-standard interaction between ICU and GICP is
   transmitting the SETSPI/CLRSPI addresses from the GICP to the
   ICU. Unfortunately, the "struct msi_msg" is only designed to carry
   a single address, while we need two. So we still have two function
   calls from ICU to the GICP to retrieve those addresses.

Changes since v1:

 - Fix the #interrupt-cells value in the ICU DT binding
   example. Pointed by Marc Zyngier.

 - Add details about the possible group types in the ICU DT binding
   documentation, as requested by Marc Zyngier. This allowed to
   discover that the list of types listed was not matching the macros
   provided in <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h>, so this
   was fixed as well.

 - Changed the "gicp" property of the ICU to "marvell,gicp", as
   suggested by Marc Zyngier.

 - Add a marvell,spi-ranges property to the gicp node, which defines
   which ranges of GIC SPI interrupts are available for us by the
   GICP.

 - Move more GICP logic into the gicp driver. Indeed, it was confusing
   to have in the ICU driver some global logic mixed with per-ICU
   logic: there is only one GICP per system, but one ICU per CP (so in
   an Armada 8K we have one GICP but two ICUs). So it makes more sense
   to handle the GICP aspects in one driver (which has only one
   device) and the ICU aspects in another driver (which has one device
   per ICU).

 - Use writel_relaxed() as suggested by Marc Zyngier.

 - Use irq_set_irqchip_state() in the ICU driver to clear any pending
   interrupt when allocating an interrupt. This ensures we don't get
   bothered by an interrupt left pending by the firmware. This
   replaces a more manual pending interrupt clearing done in the GICP
   driver, which wasn't suitable for edge triggered
   interrupts. Suggested by Marc Zyngier.

 - Use devm_kstrdup() instead of kstrdup() to fix a potential memory
   leak in the error path of ICU's ->probe() function. Noticed by Marc
   Zyngier.

 - Change compatible strings from "marvell,gicp" to
   "marvell,ap806-gicp" and "marvell,icu" to "marvell,cp110-icu", as
   future versions of those IP blocks may be different. Suggested by
   Yehuda Yitschak.

 - Use a shorter name for the irqchip domain, suggested by Grégory
   Clement.

 - Rename ICU_{SATA0,SATA1}_IRQ_INT to ICU_{SATA0,SATA1}_ICU_ID to
   clarify we're talking about ICU identifiers and not interrupt
   numbers. Suggested by Yehuda Yitschak.

 - Fix bogus message when checking the ICU group type, make sure the
   message says "wrong ICU group type" and not "wrong ICU
   type". Suggested by Yehuda Yitschak.

 - Add a check that the ICU identifier used in the DT is not higher
   than ICU_MAX_IRQS. Suggested by Yehuda Yitschak.

Best regards,

Thomas


Thomas Petazzoni (6):
  dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
  dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
  irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
  irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
  arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
  arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K

 .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt |  27 ++
 .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt  |  51 ++++
 arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi      |   7 +
 .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi      |  59 +++--
 .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi |  55 ++--
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   6 +
 drivers/irqchip/Makefile                           |   2 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c                   | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h                   |  12 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c                    | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h   |  15 ++
 12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h

-- 
2.9.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671677 — [PATCH v5 3/6] irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP

FromThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-06-21 15:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v5 3/6] irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
Message-ID<tUO1t-6FS-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671676
This commit adds a simple driver for the Marvell GICP, a hardware unit
that converts memory writes into GIC SPI interrupts. The driver provides
a number of functions to the ICU driver to allocate GICP interrupts, and
get the physical addresses that the ICUs should write to to set/clear
interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig          |   3 +
 drivers/irqchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h |  12 ++
 4 files changed, 295 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 478f8ac..e527ee5 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ config IRQ_MXS
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
 	select STMP_DEVICE
 
+config MVEBU_GICP
+	bool
+
 config MVEBU_ODMI
 	bool
 	select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
index b64c59b..11eb858 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100)		+= irq-sa11x0.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INGENIC_IRQ)		+= irq-ingenic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_GPCV2)			+= irq-imx-gpcv2.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PIC32_EVIC)		+= irq-pic32-evic.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_GICP)		+= irq-mvebu-gicp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_ODMI)		+= irq-mvebu-odmi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_PIC)			+= irq-mvebu-pic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI)		+= irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45358ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Marvell
+ *
+ * Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
+ *
+ * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
+ * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/msi.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+
+#include "irq-mvebu-gicp.h"
+
+#define GICP_SETSPI_NSR_OFFSET	0x0
+#define GICP_CLRSPI_NSR_OFFSET	0x8
+
+struct mvebu_gicp_spi_range {
+	unsigned int start;
+	unsigned int count;
+};
+
+struct mvebu_gicp {
+	struct mvebu_gicp_spi_range *spi_ranges;
+	unsigned int spi_ranges_cnt;
+	unsigned int spi_cnt;
+	unsigned long *spi_bitmap;
+	spinlock_t spi_lock;
+	struct resource *res;
+	struct device *dev;
+};
+
+static int gicp_idx_to_spi(struct mvebu_gicp *gicp, int idx)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < gicp->spi_ranges_cnt; i++) {
+		struct mvebu_gicp_spi_range *r = &gicp->spi_ranges[i];
+
+		if (idx < r->count)
+			return r->start + idx;
+
+		idx -= r->count;
+	}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+int mvebu_gicp_get_doorbells(struct device_node *dn, phys_addr_t *setspi,
+			     phys_addr_t *clrspi)
+{
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
+	struct mvebu_gicp *gicp;
+
+	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
+	if (!pdev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	gicp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	if (!gicp)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	*setspi = gicp->res->start + GICP_SETSPI_NSR_OFFSET;
+	*clrspi = gicp->res->start + GICP_CLRSPI_NSR_OFFSET;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void gicp_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct mvebu_gicp *gicp = data->chip_data;
+	phys_addr_t setspi = gicp->res->start + GICP_SETSPI_NSR_OFFSET;
+
+	msg->data = data->hwirq;
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(setspi);
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(setspi);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip gicp_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "GICP",
+	.irq_mask		= irq_chip_mask_parent,
+	.irq_unmask		= irq_chip_unmask_parent,
+	.irq_eoi		= irq_chip_eoi_parent,
+	.irq_set_affinity	= irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
+	.irq_set_type		= irq_chip_set_type_parent,
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= gicp_compose_msi_msg,
+};
+
+static int gicp_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				 unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
+{
+	struct mvebu_gicp *gicp = domain->host_data;
+	struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
+	unsigned int hwirq;
+	int ret;
+
+	spin_lock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+	hwirq = find_first_zero_bit(gicp->spi_bitmap, gicp->spi_cnt);
+	if (hwirq == gicp->spi_cnt) {
+		spin_unlock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+		return -ENOSPC;
+	}
+	__set_bit(hwirq, gicp->spi_bitmap);
+	spin_unlock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+
+	fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
+	fwspec.param_count = 3;
+	fwspec.param[0] = GIC_SPI;
+	fwspec.param[1] = gicp_idx_to_spi(gicp, hwirq) - 32;
+	/*
+	 * Assume edge rising for now, it will be properly set when
+	 * ->set_type() is called
+	 */
+	fwspec.param[2] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
+
+	ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, 1, &fwspec);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(gicp->dev, "Cannot allocate parent IRQ\n");
+		goto free_hwirq;
+	}
+
+	ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq,
+					    &gicp_irq_chip, gicp);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_irqs_parent;
+
+	return 0;
+
+free_irqs_parent:
+	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
+free_hwirq:
+	spin_lock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+	__clear_bit(hwirq, gicp->spi_bitmap);
+	spin_unlock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void gicp_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
+				 unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	struct mvebu_gicp *gicp = domain->host_data;
+	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+
+	if (d->hwirq >= gicp->spi_cnt) {
+		dev_err(gicp->dev, "Invalid hwirq %lu\n", d->hwirq);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
+
+	spin_lock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+	__clear_bit(d->hwirq, gicp->spi_bitmap);
+	spin_unlock(&gicp->spi_lock);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops gicp_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc	= gicp_irq_domain_alloc,
+	.free	= gicp_irq_domain_free,
+};
+
+static struct irq_chip gicp_msi_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "GICP",
+	.irq_set_type	= irq_chip_set_type_parent,
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_ops gicp_msi_ops = {
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_info gicp_msi_domain_info = {
+	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS),
+	.ops	= &gicp_msi_ops,
+	.chip	= &gicp_msi_irq_chip,
+};
+
+static int mvebu_gicp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct mvebu_gicp *gicp;
+	struct irq_domain *inner_domain, *plat_domain, *parent_domain;
+	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *irq_parent_dn;
+	int ret, i;
+
+	gicp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gicp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gicp)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	gicp->dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+	gicp->res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+	if (!gicp->res)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "marvell,spi-ranges");
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	gicp->spi_ranges_cnt = ret / 2;
+
+	gicp->spi_ranges =
+		devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+			     gicp->spi_ranges_cnt *
+			     sizeof(struct mvebu_gicp_spi_range),
+			     GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gicp->spi_ranges)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < gicp->spi_ranges_cnt; i++) {
+		of_property_read_u32_index(node, "marvell,spi-ranges",
+					   i * 2,
+					   &gicp->spi_ranges[i].start);
+
+		of_property_read_u32_index(node, "marvell,spi-ranges",
+					   i * 2 + 1,
+					   &gicp->spi_ranges[i].count);
+
+		gicp->spi_cnt += gicp->spi_ranges[i].count;
+	}
+
+	gicp->spi_bitmap = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+					BITS_TO_LONGS(gicp->spi_cnt),
+					GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gicp->spi_bitmap)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	irq_parent_dn = of_irq_find_parent(node);
+	if (!irq_parent_dn) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find parent IRQ node\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	parent_domain = irq_find_host(irq_parent_dn);
+	if (!parent_domain) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find parent IRQ domain\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	inner_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0,
+						   gicp->spi_cnt,
+						   of_node_to_fwnode(node),
+						   &gicp_domain_ops, gicp);
+	if (!inner_domain)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+
+	plat_domain = platform_msi_create_irq_domain(of_node_to_fwnode(node),
+						     &gicp_msi_domain_info,
+						     inner_domain);
+	if (!plat_domain) {
+		irq_domain_remove(inner_domain);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gicp);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mvebu_gicp_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "marvell,ap806-gicp", },
+	{},
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver mvebu_gicp_driver = {
+	.probe  = mvebu_gicp_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "mvebu-gicp",
+		.of_match_table = mvebu_gicp_of_match,
+	},
+};
+builtin_platform_driver(mvebu_gicp_driver);
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89a8dc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#ifndef __MVEBU_GICP_H__
+#define __MVEBU_GICP_H__
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct device_node;
+
+int mvebu_gicp_get_doorbells(struct device_node *dn, phys_addr_t *setspi,
+			     phys_addr_t *clrspi);
+
+#endif /* __MVEBU_GICP_H__ */
+
-- 
2.9.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671752 — Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-06-21 17:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K
Message-ID<tUPAe-7N4-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671676
On 21/06/17 14:29, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The Marvell Armada 7K/8K SoCs are composed of two parts: the AP (which
> contains the CPU cores) and the CP (which contains most
> peripherals). The 7K SoCs have one CP, while the 8K SoCs have two CPs,
> doubling the number of available peripherals.
> 
> In terms of interrupt handling, all devices in the CPs are connected
> through wired interrupt to a unit called ICU located in each CP. This
> unit converts the wired interrupts from the devices into memory
> transactions.
> 
> Inside the AP, there is a GIC extension called GICP, which allows a
> memory write transaction to trigger a GIC SPI interrupt. The ICUs in
> each CP are therefore configured to trigger a memory write into the
> appropriate GICP register so that a wired interrupt from a CP device
> is converted into a memory write, itself converted into a regular GIC
> SPI interrupt.
> 
> Until now, the configuration of the ICU was done statically by the
> firmware, and therefore the Device Tree files in Linux were specifying
> directly GIC interrupts for the interrupts of CP devices. However,
> with the growing number of devices in the CP, a static allocation
> scheme doesn't work for the long term.
> 
> This patch series therefore makes Linux aware of the ICU: GIC SPI
> interrupts are dynamically allocated, and the ICU is configured
> accordingly to route a CP wired interrupt to the allocated GIC SPI
> interrupt.
> 
> In detail:

[...]

> Thomas Petazzoni (6):
>   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
>   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
>   irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
>   irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
>   arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
>   arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K
> 
>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt |  27 ++
>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt  |  51 ++++
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   2 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi      |   7 +
>  .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi      |  59 +++--
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi |  55 ++--
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   6 +
>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile                           |   2 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c                   | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h                   |  12 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c                    | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h   |  15 ++
>  12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h
> 

It all looks good to me. How do we merge this? I take the first five
patches and Gregory takes the last one?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671763 — Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K
Message-ID<tUQFZ-8uH-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671752
On 21/06/17 16:42, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Marc and Thomas,
>  
>  On mer., juin 21 2017, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:14:21 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>>>> Thomas Petazzoni (6):
>>>>   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
>>>>   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
>>>>   irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
>>>>   irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
>>>>   arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
>>>>   arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K
>>>>
>>>>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt |  27 ++
>>>>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt  |  51 ++++
>>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   2 +
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi      |   7 +
>>>>  .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi      |  59 +++--
>>>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi |  55 ++--
>>>>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   6 +
>>>>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile                           |   2 +
>>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c                   | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h                   |  12 +
>>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c                    | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h   |  15 ++
>>>>  12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h
>>>>   
>>>
>>> It all looks good to me. How do we merge this? I take the first five
>>> patches and Gregory takes the last one?
>>
>> I think you should take the first four patches, and Grégory takes the
>> last two ones. But I'll let Grégory confirm.
> 
> Indeed it makes more sens to merge the patch 4 through the arm-soc
> subsystem.

Hmmm. You mean patches 5 and 6, right? And I queue 1 to 4?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671773

FromGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<tUQG0-8uH-65@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671763
Hi Marc,
 
 On mer., juin 21 2017, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:

> On 21/06/17 16:42, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Hi Marc and Thomas,
>>  
>>  On mer., juin 21 2017, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:14:21 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Thomas Petazzoni (6):
>>>>>   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
>>>>>   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
>>>>>   irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
>>>>>   irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
>>>>>   arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
>>>>>   arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K
>>>>>
>>>>>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt |  27 ++
>>>>>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt  |  51 ++++
>>>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   2 +
>>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi      |   7 +
>>>>>  .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi      |  59 +++--
>>>>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi |  55 ++--
>>>>>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   6 +
>>>>>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile                           |   2 +
>>>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c                   | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h                   |  12 +
>>>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c                    | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h   |  15 ++
>>>>>  12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
>>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>> It all looks good to me. How do we merge this? I take the first five
>>>> patches and Gregory takes the last one?
>>>
>>> I think you should take the first four patches, and Grégory takes the
>>> last two ones. But I'll let Grégory confirm.
>> 
>> Indeed it makes more sens to merge the patch 4 through the arm-soc
>> subsystem.
>
> Hmmm. You mean patches 5 and 6, right? And I queue 1 to 4?

Yes that was what I meant!

(it's too hot here and my brain is melting...)

Thanks,

Gregory

>
> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
> -- 
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671764

FromGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<tUQFZ-8uH-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671752
Hi Marc and Thomas,
 
 On mer., juin 21 2017, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:14:21 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>> > Thomas Petazzoni (6):
>> >   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
>> >   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
>> >   irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
>> >   irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
>> >   arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
>> >   arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K
>> > 
>> >  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt |  27 ++
>> >  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt  |  51 ++++
>> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   2 +
>> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi      |   7 +
>> >  .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi      |  59 +++--
>> >  .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi |  55 ++--
>> >  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   6 +
>> >  drivers/irqchip/Makefile                           |   2 +
>> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c                   | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h                   |  12 +
>> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c                    | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h   |  15 ++
>> >  12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
>> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
>> >  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
>> >  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
>> >  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
>> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h
>> >   
>> 
>> It all looks good to me. How do we merge this? I take the first five
>> patches and Gregory takes the last one?
>
> I think you should take the first four patches, and Grégory takes the
> last two ones. But I'll let Grégory confirm.

Indeed it makes more sens to merge the patch 4 through the arm-soc
subsystem.

Thanks,

Gregory
>
> Once again, thanks a lot for your help on this series, it's in a much
> better shape now compared to what the original submission was!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> -- 
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671779 — Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K

FromThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-06-21 18:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K
Message-ID<tUQFZ-8uH-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671752
Hello,

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:14:21 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:

> > Thomas Petazzoni (6):
> >   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
> >   dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
> >   irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
> >   irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
> >   arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
> >   arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K
> > 
> >  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt |  27 ++
> >  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt  |  51 ++++
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   2 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi      |   7 +
> >  .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi      |  59 +++--
> >  .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi |  55 ++--
> >  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   6 +
> >  drivers/irqchip/Makefile                           |   2 +
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c                   | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h                   |  12 +
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c                    | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h   |  15 ++
> >  12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h
> >   
> 
> It all looks good to me. How do we merge this? I take the first five
> patches and Gregory takes the last one?

I think you should take the first four patches, and Grégory takes the
last two ones. But I'll let Grégory confirm.

Once again, thanks a lot for your help on this series, it's in a much
better shape now compared to what the original submission was!

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web