Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1671424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-21 09:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-21 10:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v7 10/36] x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-21 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 10/36] x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-06-21 10:30 +0200
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 09:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 10/36] x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption |
| Message-ID | <tUI5J-31b-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > +#ifndef pgprot_encrypted > +#define pgprot_encrypted(prot) (prot) > +#endif > + > +#ifndef pgprot_decrypted That looks wrong. It's not decrypted it's rather unencrypted, right? Thanks, tglx
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUJbs-3H5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1671424 |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:18:59AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> That looks wrong. It's not decrypted it's rather unencrypted, right?
Yeah, it previous versions of the patchset, "decrypted" and
"unencrypted" were both present so we settled on "decrypted" for the
nomenclature.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web