Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1665449 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 08/18] spi: qup: Handle v1 dma completion differently

Started byVaradarajan Narayanan <varada@codeaurora.org>
First post2017-06-14 08:00 +0200
Last post2017-06-14 22:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 08/18] spi: qup: Handle v1 dma completion differently Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-14 08:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 08/18] spi: qup: Handle v1 dma completion differently Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-14 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 08/18] spi: qup: Handle v1 dma completion differently Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2017-06-14 22:00 +0200

#1665449 — [PATCH 08/18] spi: qup: Handle v1 dma completion differently

FromVaradarajan Narayanan <varada@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-06-14 08:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH 08/18] spi: qup: Handle v1 dma completion differently
Message-ID<tS9vv-1dT-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Do not assign i/o completion callbacks while running
on v1 of QUP.

Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-qup.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
index 7c22ee4..0f6a4c7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
 			  unsigned long timeout)
 {
 	struct spi_qup *qup = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	dma_async_tx_callback done = qup->qup_v1 ? NULL : spi_qup_dma_done;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* before issuing the descriptors, set the QUP to run */
@@ -346,7 +347,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
 
 	if (xfer->rx_buf) {
 		ret = spi_qup_prep_sg(master, xfer, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
-					spi_qup_dma_done, &qup->rxc);
+					done, &qup->rxc);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
 
 	if (xfer->tx_buf) {
 		ret = spi_qup_prep_sg(master, xfer, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
-					spi_qup_dma_done, &qup->txc);
+					done, &qup->txc);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1665497

FromSricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-06-14 09:20 +0200
Message-ID<tSaKR-2aJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1665449
Hi Varada,

On 6/14/2017 11:22 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Do not assign i/o completion callbacks while running
> on v1 of QUP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-qup.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
> index 7c22ee4..0f6a4c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
>  			  unsigned long timeout)
>  {
>  	struct spi_qup *qup = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> +	dma_async_tx_callback done = qup->qup_v1 ? NULL : spi_qup_dma_done;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* before issuing the descriptors, set the QUP to run */
> @@ -346,7 +347,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
>  
>  	if (xfer->rx_buf) {
>  		ret = spi_qup_prep_sg(master, xfer, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> -					spi_qup_dma_done, &qup->rxc);
> +					done, &qup->rxc);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> @@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
>  
>  	if (xfer->tx_buf) {
>  		ret = spi_qup_prep_sg(master, xfer, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> -					spi_qup_dma_done, &qup->txc);
> +					done, &qup->txc);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> 

 Not sure why we cannot use dma callback for V1 ?

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1666178

FromAndy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Date2017-06-14 22:00 +0200
Message-ID<tSmCm-X4-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1665497
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:45:51PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Varada,
> 
> On 6/14/2017 11:22 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > Do not assign i/o completion callbacks while running
> > on v1 of QUP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/spi-qup.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
> > index 7c22ee4..0f6a4c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c
> > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
> >  			  unsigned long timeout)
> >  {
> >  	struct spi_qup *qup = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > +	dma_async_tx_callback done = qup->qup_v1 ? NULL : spi_qup_dma_done;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	/* before issuing the descriptors, set the QUP to run */
> > @@ -346,7 +347,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
> >  
> >  	if (xfer->rx_buf) {
> >  		ret = spi_qup_prep_sg(master, xfer, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> > -					spi_qup_dma_done, &qup->rxc);
> > +					done, &qup->rxc);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ static int spi_qup_do_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
> >  
> >  	if (xfer->tx_buf) {
> >  		ret = spi_qup_prep_sg(master, xfer, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> > -					spi_qup_dma_done, &qup->txc);
> > +					done, &qup->txc);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >  
> > 
> 
>  Not sure why we cannot use dma callback for V1 ?

V1 is for ADMA.  V2+ is BAM.  We only needed the callback for BAM


Regards,

Andy

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web