Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1666163 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-14 21:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-14 21:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-06-14 21:30 +0200
| From | Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-14 21:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree |
| Message-ID | <tSm9j-MK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 22/04/2017 01:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:12:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Mason, >> >> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:58:58 +0200 Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Anyway, the fix is trivial. >>> >>> The "pchans_used" field is an unsigned long array. >>> for_each_clear_bit_from() expects an unsigned long pointer, >>> not an array address. >>> >>> I'll send a patch to the drivers/dma maintainers. >> >> The fix really needs to go into the arm tree (as well?) since that is >> the tree that has the patch that causes the build to break (even if the >> actual bug was preexisting). > > Or I drop the offending patch (done) and we get the DMA subsystem fixed > first. Given how long it's been this way, I doubt there's any hurry to > get this change in for the next merge window. Hello Russell, Is it safe to apply the patch now? http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8679/1 Regards.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web