Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1667200 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: report module before querying isactivation in dwfl unwind

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: report module before querying  isactivation in dwfl unwind Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> - 2017-06-15 21:30 +0200

#1667200 — Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: report module before querying isactivation in dwfl unwind

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:47:20 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:25:08PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:37:53PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > > The PC returned by dwfl_frame_pc may map into a not-yet-reported
> > > module. We have to report it before we continue unwinding. But when
> > > we query for the isactivation flag in dwfl_frame_pc, libdw will
> > > actually do one more unwinding step internally which can then break
> > > and lead to missed frames or broken stacks.
> > > 
> > > With libunwind we get e.g.:
> 
> sounds like a libdw design issue.. Jan is there a specific way
> to handle the case that Milian described?

I agree with the patch.

Just be aware for performance then the __report_module() call in entry() is no
longer useful as the '--pc' adjustment should never cross a module boundary.

Although for perf unwinding performance there is still a wide gap there
(such as caching the loaded modules for multiple backtraces.)


Thanks,
Jan

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web