Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1663499 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-12 15:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-12 16:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH V2 00/37] perf intel-pt: Power events and PTWRITE Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2017-06-12 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2 00/37] perf intel-pt: Power events and PTWRITE Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-06-12 16:00 +0200
| From | Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-12 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 00/37] perf intel-pt: Power events and PTWRITE |
| Message-ID | <tRxqa-2AI-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 26/05/17 11:17, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Hi > > Here are some patches to support Intel PT Power events and PTWRITE. > Power events report changes to C-state but I have also added support > for the existing CBR (core-to-bus ratio) packet and included that > when outputting power events. The PTWRITE packet is associated with > the new ptwrite instruction, which is essentially just a way to stuff > a 32 or 64 bit value into the PT trace. More details can be found in > the patches that add documentation and in the Intel SDM. > > As far as I know, there isn't any hardware released that supports > the new packets, however the CBR packet is not new and will now be > visible by default. > > There are also some miscellaneous improvements to Intel PT. > > There are 3 patches that introduce a new way to define synthesized > events that carry arbitrary raw_data. I sent an RFC about that earlier. > The 3 patches are: > perf script: Add 'synth' event type for synthesized events > perf script: Add 'synth' field for synthesized event payloads > perf script: Add synthesized Intel PT power and ptwrite events > > > Changes in V2: > > Reorder patches and add stable tags to fixes. > Apart from "perf script: Add 'synth' event type for synthesized events" patches still apply. Any comments?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-12 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tRy2R-2NA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1663499 |
Em Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:04:44PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > On 26/05/17 11:17, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > Hi > > > > Here are some patches to support Intel PT Power events and PTWRITE. > > Power events report changes to C-state but I have also added support > > for the existing CBR (core-to-bus ratio) packet and included that > > when outputting power events. The PTWRITE packet is associated with > > the new ptwrite instruction, which is essentially just a way to stuff > > a 32 or 64 bit value into the PT trace. More details can be found in > > the patches that add documentation and in the Intel SDM. > > > > As far as I know, there isn't any hardware released that supports > > the new packets, however the CBR packet is not new and will now be > > visible by default. > > > > There are also some miscellaneous improvements to Intel PT. > > > > There are 3 patches that introduce a new way to define synthesized > > events that carry arbitrary raw_data. I sent an RFC about that earlier. > > The 3 patches are: > > perf script: Add 'synth' event type for synthesized events > > perf script: Add 'synth' field for synthesized event payloads > > perf script: Add synthesized Intel PT power and ptwrite events > > > > > > Changes in V2: > > > > Reorder patches and add stable tags to fixes. > > > > Apart from "perf script: Add 'synth' event type for synthesized events" > patches still apply. Any comments? I'll look at it today, - Arnaldo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web