Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1664869 > unrolled thread

[PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static

Started byColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
First post2017-06-13 15:50 +0200
Last post2017-06-15 15:20 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-06-13 15:50 +0200
    Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function  cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-14 15:10 +0200
      Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function  cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-15 15:20 +0200

#1664869 — [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static

FromColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date2017-06-13 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
Message-ID<tRUmK-ap-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
"symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
 be static?"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 	return true;
 }
 
-bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
-				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
+static bool
+cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
+			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
 {
 	uint32_t cfgcr0;
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1665803 — Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static

FromTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-06-14 15:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
Message-ID<tSgdz-5BT-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1664869
On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> scope, so make it static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
>   be static?"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> -				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static bool
> +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> +			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
>   {
>   	uint32_t cfgcr0;
>   
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1666718 — Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static

FromVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-06-15 15:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
Message-ID<tSCQO-2X8-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1665803
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> > 
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> >   be static?"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >   	return true;
> >   }
> >   
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > -				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > +			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> >   {
> >   	uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >   
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web