Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1664451 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 0/3] Fix some style issues

Started byAviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
First post2017-06-13 07:50 +0200
Last post2017-06-13 11:30 +0200
Articles 6 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix some style issues Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 07:50 +0200
    [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unneeded blank lines Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 08:00 +0200
    [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 08:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-13 08:10 +0200
    [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 08:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-13 11:30 +0200

#1664451 — [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix some style issues

FromAviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-13 07:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 0/3] Fix some style issues
Message-ID<tRMSe-3YG-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fix some of the issues that checkpatch complains on like redundant
parenthesis, redundant blank lines and lines over 80 chars.

Aviya Erenfeld (3):
  staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis
  staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unneeded blank lines
  staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars

 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1664453 — [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unneeded blank lines

FromAviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-13 08:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 2/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unneeded blank lines
Message-ID<tRN1U-41I-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1664451
Remove unneeded blank lines

Signed-off-by: Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
index c6a7df5..cd348ca 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ static void _rtw_init_stainfo(struct sta_info *psta)
 	psta->keep_alive_trycnt = 0;
 
 #endif	/*  CONFIG_88EU_AP_MODE */
-
 }
 
 u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
@@ -69,7 +68,6 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 	struct sta_info *psta;
 	s32 i;
 
-
 	pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(struct sta_info) * NUM_STA + 4);
 
 	if (!pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf)
@@ -116,7 +114,6 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 	pstapriv->max_num_sta = NUM_STA;
 #endif
 
-
 	return _SUCCESS;
 }
 
@@ -263,7 +260,6 @@ u32	rtw_free_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 	struct	xmit_priv	*pxmitpriv = &padapter->xmitpriv;
 	struct	sta_priv *pstapriv = &padapter->stapriv;
 
-
 	if (!psta)
 		goto exit;
 
@@ -381,7 +377,6 @@ u32	rtw_free_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 
 exit:
 
-
 	return _SUCCESS;
 }
 
@@ -394,7 +389,6 @@ void rtw_free_all_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter)
 	struct	sta_priv *pstapriv = &padapter->stapriv;
 	struct sta_info *pbcmc_stainfo = rtw_get_bcmc_stainfo(padapter);
 
-
 	if (pstapriv->asoc_sta_count == 1)
 		return;
 
@@ -425,7 +419,6 @@ struct sta_info *rtw_get_stainfo(struct sta_priv *pstapriv, u8 *hwaddr)
 	u8 *addr;
 	u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
 
-
 	if (!hwaddr)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -463,7 +456,6 @@ u32 rtw_init_bcmc_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter)
 	unsigned char bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
 	struct	sta_priv *pstapriv = &padapter->stapriv;
 
-
 	psta = rtw_alloc_stainfo(pstapriv, bcast_addr);
 
 	if (!psta) {
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1664456 — [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars

FromAviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-13 08:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars
Message-ID<tRN1U-41I-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1664451
Shorten lines over 80 chars

Signed-off-by: Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
index cd348ca..c924c9e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 	struct sta_info *psta;
 	s32 i;
 
-	pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(struct sta_info) * NUM_STA + 4);
+	pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(struct sta_info) *
+						   NUM_STA + 4);
 
 	if (!pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf)
 		return _FAIL;
@@ -91,7 +92,8 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pstapriv->sta_hash[i]);
 
-		list_add_tail(&psta->list, get_list_head(&pstapriv->free_sta_queue));
+		list_add_tail(&psta->list,
+			      get_list_head(&pstapriv->free_sta_queue));
 
 		psta++;
 	}
@@ -119,20 +121,25 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 
 inline int rtw_stainfo_offset(struct sta_priv *stapriv, struct sta_info *sta)
 {
-	int offset = (((u8 *)sta) - stapriv->pstainfo_buf)/sizeof(struct sta_info);
+	int offset = (((u8 *)sta) - stapriv->pstainfo_buf) /
+		      sizeof(struct sta_info);
 
 	if (!stainfo_offset_valid(offset))
-		DBG_88E("%s invalid offset(%d), out of range!!!", __func__, offset);
+		DBG_88E("%s invalid offset(%d), out of range!!!",
+			__func__, offset);
 
 	return offset;
 }
 
-inline struct sta_info *rtw_get_stainfo_by_offset(struct sta_priv *stapriv, int offset)
+inline struct sta_info *rtw_get_stainfo_by_offset(struct sta_priv *stapriv,
+						  int offset)
 {
 	if (!stainfo_offset_valid(offset))
-		DBG_88E("%s invalid offset(%d), out of range!!!", __func__, offset);
+		DBG_88E("%s invalid offset(%d), out of range!!!",
+			__func__, offset);
 
-	return (struct sta_info *)(stapriv->pstainfo_buf + offset * sizeof(struct sta_info));
+	return (struct sta_info *)(stapriv->pstainfo_buf +
+				   offset * sizeof(struct sta_info));
 }
 
 u32	_rtw_free_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
@@ -157,7 +164,8 @@ u32	_rtw_free_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 				plist = plist->next;
 
 				for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-					preorder_ctrl = &psta->recvreorder_ctrl[i];
+					preorder_ctrl =
+						&psta->recvreorder_ctrl[i];
 					del_timer_sync(&preorder_ctrl->reordering_ctrl_timer);
 				}
 			}
@@ -194,9 +202,11 @@ struct sta_info *rtw_alloc_stainfo(struct sta_priv *pstapriv, u8 *hwaddr)
 		_rtw_init_stainfo(psta);
 		memcpy(psta->hwaddr, hwaddr, ETH_ALEN);
 		index = wifi_mac_hash(hwaddr);
-		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_info_, ("rtw_alloc_stainfo: index=%x", index));
+		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_info_,
+			 ("rtw_alloc_stainfo: index=%x", index));
 		if (index >= NUM_STA) {
-			RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_err_, ("ERROR => rtw_alloc_stainfo: index >= NUM_STA"));
+			RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_err_,
+				 ("ERROR => rtw_alloc_stainfo: index >= NUM_STA"));
 			psta = NULL;
 			goto exit;
 		}
@@ -208,12 +218,16 @@ struct sta_info *rtw_alloc_stainfo(struct sta_priv *pstapriv, u8 *hwaddr)
 		spin_unlock_bh(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);
 
 /*  Commented by Albert 2009/08/13 */
-/*  For the SMC router, the sequence number of first packet of WPS handshake will be 0. */
-/*  In this case, this packet will be dropped by recv_decache function if we use the 0x00 as the default value for tid_rxseq variable. */
-/*  So, we initialize the tid_rxseq variable as the 0xffff. */
+/*  For the SMC router, the sequence number of first packet of WPS handshake
+ *  will be 0.
+ *  In this case, this packet will be dropped by recv_decache function if we use
+ *  the 0x00 as the default value for tid_rxseq variable.
+ *  So, we initialize the tid_rxseq variable as the 0xffff.
+ */
 
 		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
-			memcpy(&psta->sta_recvpriv.rxcache.tid_rxseq[i], &wRxSeqInitialValue, 2);
+			memcpy(&psta->sta_recvpriv.rxcache.tid_rxseq[i],
+			       &wRxSeqInitialValue, 2);
 
 		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_info_,
 			 ("alloc number_%d stainfo  with hwaddr = %pM\n",
@@ -304,18 +318,22 @@ u32	rtw_free_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 
 	del_timer_sync(&psta->addba_retry_timer);
 
-	/* for A-MPDU Rx reordering buffer control, cancel reordering_ctrl_timer */
+	/* for A-MPDU Rx reordering buffer control,
+	 * cancel reordering_ctrl_timer
+	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
 		struct list_head *phead, *plist;
 		struct recv_frame *prframe;
 		struct __queue *ppending_recvframe_queue;
-		struct __queue *pfree_recv_queue = &padapter->recvpriv.free_recv_queue;
+		struct __queue *pfree_recv_queue =
+			&padapter->recvpriv.free_recv_queue;
 
 		preorder_ctrl = &psta->recvreorder_ctrl[i];
 
 		del_timer_sync(&preorder_ctrl->reordering_ctrl_timer);
 
-		ppending_recvframe_queue = &preorder_ctrl->pending_recvframe_queue;
+		ppending_recvframe_queue =
+			&preorder_ctrl->pending_recvframe_queue;
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&ppending_recvframe_queue->lock);
 
@@ -453,14 +471,16 @@ u32 rtw_init_bcmc_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter)
 {
 	struct sta_info		*psta;
 	u32 res = _SUCCESS;
-	unsigned char bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
+	unsigned char bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
+					      0xff};
 	struct	sta_priv *pstapriv = &padapter->stapriv;
 
 	psta = rtw_alloc_stainfo(pstapriv, bcast_addr);
 
 	if (!psta) {
 		res = _FAIL;
-		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_err_, ("rtw_alloc_stainfo fail"));
+		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_sta_mgt_c_, _drv_err_,
+			 ("rtw_alloc_stainfo fail"));
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1664465 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars

FromJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date2017-06-13 08:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Shorten lines over 80 chars
Message-ID<tRNbz-4k7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1664456
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 08:52 +0300, Aviya Erenfeld wrote:
> Shorten lines over 80 chars

Most of these changes are not useful.

Style nits if 80 columns are _really_ desired.

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
[]
> @@ -157,7 +164,8 @@ u32	_rtw_free_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
>  				plist = plist->next;
>  
>  				for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> -					preorder_ctrl = &psta->recvreorder_ctrl[i];
> +					preorder_ctrl =
> +						&psta->recvreorder_ctrl[i];
>  					del_timer_sync(&preorder_ctrl->reordering_ctrl_timer);

This is harder to read.

> @@ -453,14 +471,16 @@ u32 rtw_init_bcmc_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter)
>  {
>  	struct sta_info		*psta;
>  	u32 res = _SUCCESS;
> -	unsigned char bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
> +	unsigned char bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> +					      0xff};

More common would be

	unsigned char bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {
		0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff
	};

Better still would be to use static const.
Best would be to see if bcast_addr is needed at all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1664457 — [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis

FromAviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-13 08:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis
Message-ID<tRN1V-41I-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1664451
Remove redundant parenthesis

Signed-off-by: Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
index 2ecfb11..c6a7df5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_STA; i++) {
 		_rtw_init_stainfo(psta);
 
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(pstapriv->sta_hash[i]));
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pstapriv->sta_hash[i]);
 
 		list_add_tail(&psta->list, get_list_head(&pstapriv->free_sta_queue));
 
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ u32	_rtw_free_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 		/*	delete all reordering_ctrl_timer		*/
 		spin_lock_bh(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);
 		for (index = 0; index < NUM_STA; index++) {
-			phead = &(pstapriv->sta_hash[index]);
+			phead = &pstapriv->sta_hash[index];
 			plist = phead->next;
 
 			while (phead != plist) {
@@ -278,19 +278,19 @@ u32	rtw_free_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 
 	rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(pxmitpriv, &pstaxmitpriv->vo_q.sta_pending);
 
-	list_del_init(&(pstaxmitpriv->vo_q.tx_pending));
+	list_del_init(&pstaxmitpriv->vo_q.tx_pending);
 
 	rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(pxmitpriv, &pstaxmitpriv->vi_q.sta_pending);
 
-	list_del_init(&(pstaxmitpriv->vi_q.tx_pending));
+	list_del_init(&pstaxmitpriv->vi_q.tx_pending);
 
 	rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(pxmitpriv, &pstaxmitpriv->bk_q.sta_pending);
 
-	list_del_init(&(pstaxmitpriv->bk_q.tx_pending));
+	list_del_init(&pstaxmitpriv->bk_q.tx_pending);
 
 	rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(pxmitpriv, &pstaxmitpriv->be_q.sta_pending);
 
-	list_del_init(&(pstaxmitpriv->be_q.tx_pending));
+	list_del_init(&pstaxmitpriv->be_q.tx_pending);
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pxmitpriv->lock);
 
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ u32	rtw_free_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 
 			plist = plist->next;
 
-			list_del_init(&(prframe->list));
+			list_del_init(&prframe->list);
 
 			rtw_free_recvframe(prframe, pfree_recv_queue);
 		}
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ u32	rtw_free_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 
 #endif	/*  CONFIG_88EU_AP_MODE */
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&(pfree_sta_queue->lock));
+	spin_lock_bh(&pfree_sta_queue->lock);
 	list_add_tail(&psta->list, get_list_head(pfree_sta_queue));
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pfree_sta_queue->lock);
 
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ void rtw_free_all_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter)
 	spin_lock_bh(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);
 
 	for (index = 0; index < NUM_STA; index++) {
-		phead = &(pstapriv->sta_hash[index]);
+		phead = &pstapriv->sta_hash[index];
 		plist = phead->next;
 
 		while (phead != plist) {
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ struct sta_info *rtw_get_stainfo(struct sta_priv *pstapriv, u8 *hwaddr)
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);
 
-	phead = &(pstapriv->sta_hash[index]);
+	phead = &pstapriv->sta_hash[index];
 	plist = phead->next;
 
 	while (phead != plist) {
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ u8 rtw_access_ctrl(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *mac_addr)
 	struct wlan_acl_pool *pacl_list = &pstapriv->acl_list;
 	struct __queue *pacl_node_q = &pacl_list->acl_node_q;
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&(pacl_node_q->lock));
+	spin_lock_bh(&pacl_node_q->lock);
 	phead = get_list_head(pacl_node_q);
 	plist = phead->next;
 	while (phead != plist) {
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1664627 — Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-06-13 11:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove redundant parenthesis
Message-ID<tRQj7-6bD-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1664457
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:50:38AM +0300, Aviya Erenfeld wrote:
> Remove redundant parenthesis
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
> index 2ecfb11..c6a7df5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ u32	_rtw_init_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_STA; i++) {
>  		_rtw_init_stainfo(psta);
>  
> -		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(pstapriv->sta_hash[i]));
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pstapriv->sta_hash[i]);

What complaines about these?  Does checkpatch?  Or something else?

It makes sense why they were added, don't you think so?  It makes the
code easier to understand in some places.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web