Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1658348 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] FORTIFY_SOURCE build fixes

Started byKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
First post2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
Last post2017-06-06 18:20 +0200
Articles 6 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] FORTIFY_SOURCE build fixes Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
    [PATCH 4/6] kexec_file: Adjust declaration of kexec_purgatory Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
    [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-06-06 11:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-06-06 11:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-06 18:20 +0200

#1658348 — [PATCH] FORTIFY_SOURCE build fixes

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH] FORTIFY_SOURCE build fixes
Message-ID<tPeKZ-460-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
I was originally carrying these patches in my KSPP tree, but akpm
is taking the FORTIFY_SOURCE patch into -mm. As such, these fixes
should be included as well.

-Kees

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1658349 — [PATCH 4/6] kexec_file: Adjust declaration of kexec_purgatory

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH 4/6] kexec_file: Adjust declaration of kexec_purgatory
Message-ID<tPeL0-460-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1658348
Defining kexec_purgatory as a zero-length char array upsets compile
time size checking. Since this is built on a per-arch basis, define
it as an unsized char array (like is done for other similar things,
e.g. linker sections). This silences the warning generated by the future
CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, which did not like the memcmp() of a "0 byte"
array. This drops the __weak and uses an extern instead, since both
users define kexec_purgatory.

Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 kernel/kexec_file.c     | 7 -------
 kernel/kexec_internal.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
index f78f719dae36..5710591a9b6d 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
@@ -26,13 +26,6 @@
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include "kexec_internal.h"
 
-/*
- * Declare these symbols weak so that if architecture provides a purgatory,
- * these will be overridden.
- */
-char __weak kexec_purgatory[0];
-size_t __weak kexec_purgatory_size = 0;
-
 static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image);
 
 /* Architectures can provide this probe function */
diff --git a/kernel/kexec_internal.h b/kernel/kexec_internal.h
index 799a8a452187..50dfcb039a41 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/kexec_internal.h
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ extern struct mutex kexec_mutex;
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
 #include <linux/purgatory.h>
 void kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
+extern char kexec_purgatory[];
+extern size_t kexec_purgatory_size;
 #else /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
 static inline void kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1658353 — [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array
Message-ID<tPeL0-460-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1658348
Adjust vdso_{start|end} to be char arrays to avoid compile-time analysis
that flags "too large" memcmp() calls with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
index 41b6e31f8f55..ae35f1855e06 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 #include <asm/vdso.h>
 #include <asm/vdso_datapage.h>
 
-extern char vdso_start, vdso_end;
+extern char vdso_start[], vdso_end[];
 static unsigned long vdso_pages __ro_after_init;
 
 /*
@@ -125,14 +125,14 @@ static int __init vdso_init(void)
 	struct page **vdso_pagelist;
 	unsigned long pfn;
 
-	if (memcmp(&vdso_start, "\177ELF", 4)) {
+	if (memcmp(vdso_start, "\177ELF", 4)) {
 		pr_err("vDSO is not a valid ELF object!\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	vdso_pages = (&vdso_end - &vdso_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	vdso_pages = (vdso_end - vdso_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	pr_info("vdso: %ld pages (%ld code @ %p, %ld data @ %p)\n",
-		vdso_pages + 1, vdso_pages, &vdso_start, 1L, vdso_data);
+		vdso_pages + 1, vdso_pages, vdso_start, 1L, vdso_data);
 
 	/* Allocate the vDSO pagelist, plus a page for the data. */
 	vdso_pagelist = kcalloc(vdso_pages + 1, sizeof(struct page *),
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int __init vdso_init(void)
 
 
 	/* Grab the vDSO code pages. */
-	pfn = sym_to_pfn(&vdso_start);
+	pfn = sym_to_pfn(vdso_start);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vdso_pages; i++)
 		vdso_pagelist[i + 1] = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1658546 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array

FromCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date2017-06-06 11:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array
Message-ID<tPjhD-6Wc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1658353
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:52:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Adjust vdso_{start|end} to be char arrays to avoid compile-time analysis
> that flags "too large" memcmp() calls with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1658555 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array

FromWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date2017-06-06 11:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array
Message-ID<tPjhE-6Wc-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1658546
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:43:52AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:52:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Adjust vdso_{start|end} to be char arrays to avoid compile-time analysis
> > that flags "too large" memcmp() calls with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Kees -- I'm assuming this series is going via some other tree, but let me
know if you want this patch to go via arm64.

Will

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1658907 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2017-06-06 18:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array
Message-ID<tPpn3-2GL-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1658555
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:43:52AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:52:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > Adjust vdso_{start|end} to be char arrays to avoid compile-time analysis
>> > that flags "too large" memcmp() calls with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
>> >
>> > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> > Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>
> Kees -- I'm assuming this series is going via some other tree, but let me
> know if you want this patch to go via arm64.

Greg has picked up the staging fix, so it's fine if it goes via other
trees. I think akpm will pick up anything that is left over. So, yeah,
please take it via arm64.

(And I need to fix git send-email to actually Cc people on
"Suggested-by", etc... hmm)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web