Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1659275 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-07 01:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-07 21:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 02/17] pcie-xilinx: add missing 5th legacy interrupt Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> - 2017-06-07 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/17] pcie-xilinx: add missing 5th legacy interrupt Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-06-07 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/17] pcie-xilinx: add missing 5th legacy interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-06-07 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/17] pcie-xilinx: add missing 5th legacy interrupt Wesley Terpstra <wesley@sifive.com> - 2017-06-07 21:10 +0200
| From | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-07 01:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 02/17] pcie-xilinx: add missing 5th legacy interrupt |
| Message-ID | <tPvLQ-6UA-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: "Wesley W. Terpstra" <wesley@sifive.com>
These are numbered from 1.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
---
drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
index 2fe2df51f9f8..8804145d399a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xilinx_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
val = ((val & XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_MASK) >>
XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_SHIFT) + 1;
generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(port->leg_domain,
- val));
+ val + 1));
}
}
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
return -ENODEV;
}
- port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4,
+ port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 5,
&intx_domain_ops,
port);
if (!port->leg_domain) {
--
2.13.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-07 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tPDq1-3rU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1659275 |
CC pci folks
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
> From: "Wesley W. Terpstra" <wesley@sifive.com>
>
> These are numbered from 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> index 2fe2df51f9f8..8804145d399a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xilinx_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
> val = ((val & XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_MASK) >>
> XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_SHIFT) + 1;
> generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(port->leg_domain,
> - val));
> + val + 1));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4,
> + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 5,
> &intx_domain_ops,
> port);
> if (!port->leg_domain) {
> --
> 2.13.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-07 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tPFrP-4M0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1659275 |
+ Bjorn
On 06/06/17 23:59, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: "Wesley W. Terpstra" <wesley@sifive.com>
>
> These are numbered from 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> index 2fe2df51f9f8..8804145d399a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xilinx_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
> val = ((val & XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_MASK) >>
> XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_SHIFT) + 1;
> generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(port->leg_domain,
> - val));
> + val + 1));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4,
> + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 5,
> &intx_domain_ops,
> port);
> if (!port->leg_domain) {
>
This is a common problem with the current OF code that numbers INTx from
1 instead of zero (there is no 5th legacy interrupts in the PCI spec,
despite what $SUBJECT says). I'd be inclined to fix this at the core
level rather than papering over it in the various drivers...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wesley Terpstra <wesley@sifive.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-07 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tPOv7-2fF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1659583 |
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote: > This is a common problem with the current OF code that numbers INTx from > 1 instead of zero (there is no 5th legacy interrupts in the PCI spec, > despite what $SUBJECT says). I'd be inclined to fix this at the core > level rather than papering over it in the various drivers... While I agree that it's a problem with OF, every other driver has already been changed to paper over the issue. This patch just brings this one remaining OF-PCIe driver to the same level as the others. Without the patch, the driver doesn't work at all if there is a bridge chip on the other end of the controller, so this is not just a hypothetical concern for us. Couldn't the eventual OF fix just refactor this driver along with all of the others? Doing such a sweeping OF change is outside my current comfort zone. I am not familiar enough with the code to understand all the parts that would need to be touched.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web