Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1654789 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss

Started byJia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
First post2017-06-01 05:50 +0200
Last post2017-06-05 03:10 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> - 2017-06-01 05:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in  rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-03 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> - 2017-06-05 03:10 +0200

#1654789 — [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss

FromJia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Date2017-06-01 05:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss
Message-ID<tNphv-5Fb-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
The driver may sleep under a spin lock, and the function call path is:
rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss (acquire the lock by spin_lock)
  rtsx_enter_ss
    rtsx_power_off_card
      sd_cleanup_work
        sd_stop_seq_mode
          sd_switch_clock
            sd_ddr_tuning
              sd_ddr_pre_tuning_tx
                sd_change_phase
                  wait_timeout
                    schedule_timeout --> may sleep

To fix it, "wait_timeout" is replaced with mdelay in sd_change_phase.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
index bdd35b6..76bd105 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir)
 
 	rtsx_write_register(chip, SD_DCMPS_CTL, DCMPS_CHANGE, 0);
 	rtsx_write_register(chip, SD_VP_CTL, PHASE_CHANGE, 0);
-	wait_timeout(10);
+	mdelay(10);
 	sd_reset_dcm(chip, tune_dir);
 	return STATUS_FAIL;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1656825 — Re: [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-06-03 16:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss
Message-ID<tOhUD-81i-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1654789
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:43:35AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The driver may sleep under a spin lock, and the function call path is:
> rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss (acquire the lock by spin_lock)
>   rtsx_enter_ss
>     rtsx_power_off_card
>       sd_cleanup_work
>         sd_stop_seq_mode
>           sd_switch_clock
>             sd_ddr_tuning
>               sd_ddr_pre_tuning_tx
>                 sd_change_phase
>                   wait_timeout
>                     schedule_timeout --> may sleep
> 
> To fix it, "wait_timeout" is replaced with mdelay in sd_change_phase.

Nice work, how are you finding these bugs?  What tools gives you this
kind of analysis?

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1657202

FromJia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Date2017-06-05 03:10 +0200
Message-ID<tOOGR-4jH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1656825
On 06/03/2017 04:52 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:43:35AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> The driver may sleep under a spin lock, and the function call path is:
>> rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss (acquire the lock by spin_lock)
>>    rtsx_enter_ss
>>      rtsx_power_off_card
>>        sd_cleanup_work
>>          sd_stop_seq_mode
>>            sd_switch_clock
>>              sd_ddr_tuning
>>                sd_ddr_pre_tuning_tx
>>                  sd_change_phase
>>                    wait_timeout
>>                      schedule_timeout -->  may sleep
>>
>> To fix it, "wait_timeout" is replaced with mdelay in sd_change_phase.
> Nice work, how are you finding these bugs?  What tools gives you this
> kind of analysis?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi,

I am very glad to get your praise on my work :)
I recently write a static analysis tool for detecting sleep-in-atomic 
bugs, instead of using existing tools. One reason is that I have 
encountered these bugs for some times when I writing drivers.
I am still improving my tool and detecting other similar bugs in Linux 
kernel. If you have suggestions or comments on my work, please feel free 
to contact me :)

Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web