Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1656537 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-02 22:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-05 00:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [patch v2] mm, vmscan: avoid thrashing anon lru when free + file is low Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-02 22:40 +0200
Re: [patch v2] mm, vmscan: avoid thrashing anon lru when free + file is low David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2017-06-05 00:30 +0200
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 22:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [patch v2] mm, vmscan: avoid thrashing anon lru when free + file is low |
| Message-ID | <tO1wu-5YJ-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, 1 May 2017 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> The purpose of the code that commit 623762517e23 ("revert 'mm: vmscan: do
> not swap anon pages just because free+file is low'") reintroduces is to
> prefer swapping anonymous memory rather than trashing the file lru.
>
> If the anonymous inactive lru for the set of eligible zones is considered
> low, however, or the length of the list for the given reclaim priority
> does not allow for effective anonymous-only reclaiming, then avoid
> forcing SCAN_ANON. Forcing SCAN_ANON will end up thrashing the small
> list and leave unreclaimed memory on the file lrus.
>
> If the inactive list is insufficient, fallback to balanced reclaim so the
> file lru doesn't remain untouched.
>
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-avoid-thrashing-anon-lru-when-free-file-is-low-fix
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec
* anonymous pages on the LRU in eligible zones.
* Otherwise, the small LRU gets thrashed.
*/
- if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, false) &&
+ if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, memcg, sc, false) &&
lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx)
>> sc->priority) {
scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
Worried. Did you send the correct version?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 00:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [patch v2] mm, vmscan: avoid thrashing anon lru when free + file is low |
| Message-ID | <tOMc1-2Hv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1656537 |
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2017 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>
> > The purpose of the code that commit 623762517e23 ("revert 'mm: vmscan: do
> > not swap anon pages just because free+file is low'") reintroduces is to
> > prefer swapping anonymous memory rather than trashing the file lru.
> >
> > If the anonymous inactive lru for the set of eligible zones is considered
> > low, however, or the length of the list for the given reclaim priority
> > does not allow for effective anonymous-only reclaiming, then avoid
> > forcing SCAN_ANON. Forcing SCAN_ANON will end up thrashing the small
> > list and leave unreclaimed memory on the file lrus.
> >
> > If the inactive list is insufficient, fallback to balanced reclaim so the
> > file lru doesn't remain untouched.
> >
>
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-avoid-thrashing-anon-lru-when-free-file-is-low-fix
> +++ a/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec
> * anonymous pages on the LRU in eligible zones.
> * Otherwise, the small LRU gets thrashed.
> */
> - if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, false) &&
> + if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, memcg, sc, false) &&
> lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx)
> >> sc->priority) {
> scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
>
> Worried. Did you send the correct version?
>
The patch was written before commit 2a2e48854d70 ("mm: vmscan: fix
IO/refault regression in cache workingset transition") was merged and
changed inactive_list_is_low().
Your rebase looks good. It could have used NULL instead of memcg since
this is only for global_reclaim() and memcg will always be NULL here, but
that's just personal preference.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web