Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1655034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-01 13:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-01 15:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Fix crash in perf_hpp__reset_output_field Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> - 2017-06-01 13:20 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Remove extra list_del_init calls in list reset Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> - 2017-06-01 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Remove extra list_del_init calls in list reset Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-06-01 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Remove extra list_del_init calls in list reset Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 15:20 +0200
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 13:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Fix crash in perf_hpp__reset_output_field |
| Message-ID | <tNwj0-1RP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Du Changbin reported crash [1] when calling perf_hpp__reset_output_field
after unregistering field via perf_hpp__column_unregister.
This ends up in calling following list_del* sequence on
the same format:
perf_hpp__column_unregister:
list_del(&format->list);
perf_hpp__reset_output_field:
list_del_init(&fmt->list);
where the later list_del_init might touch already
freed formats.
Fixing this by replacing list_del with list_del_init
in perf_hpp__column_unregister.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149059595826019&w=2
Reported-by: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-8umo89ntt3kawmfwsivav43t@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
index 59addd52d9cd..feb2174ddd1f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
{
- list_del(&format->list);
+ list_del_init(&format->list);
}
void perf_hpp__cancel_cumulate(void)
--
2.9.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 13:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Remove extra list_del_init calls in list reset |
| Message-ID | <tNwj0-1RP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1655034 |
We only needs to remove the format from the currently
iterated list. The other removals/inits are superfluous
because we free the format in any case.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-8umo89ntt3kawmfwsivav43t@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
index feb2174ddd1f..a0fee2ac8599 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -614,15 +614,15 @@ void perf_hpp__reset_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list)
/* reset output fields */
perf_hpp_list__for_each_format_safe(list, fmt, tmp) {
- list_del_init(&fmt->list);
- list_del_init(&fmt->sort_list);
+ list_del(&fmt->list);
+ /* Remove the fmt from next loop processing. */
+ list_del(&fmt->sort_list);
fmt_free(fmt);
}
/* reset sort keys */
perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list_safe(list, fmt, tmp) {
- list_del_init(&fmt->list);
- list_del_init(&fmt->sort_list);
+ list_del(&fmt->sort_list);
fmt_free(fmt);
}
}
--
2.9.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 15:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Remove extra list_del_init calls in list reset |
| Message-ID | <tNy1r-2YH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1655041 |
Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 01:17:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> We only needs to remove the format from the currently
> iterated list. The other removals/inits are superfluous
> because we free the format in any case.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-8umo89ntt3kawmfwsivav43t@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> index feb2174ddd1f..a0fee2ac8599 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> @@ -614,15 +614,15 @@ void perf_hpp__reset_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list)
>
> /* reset output fields */
> perf_hpp_list__for_each_format_safe(list, fmt, tmp) {
> - list_del_init(&fmt->list);
> - list_del_init(&fmt->sort_list);
> + list_del(&fmt->list);
> + /* Remove the fmt from next loop processing. */
> + list_del(&fmt->sort_list);
Why not just add the comment and leave it as list_del_init(), then, in
fmt_free() -> fmt->free() -> hse_free() (for instance), have:
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->list));
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->sort_list));
The patch would be smaller and overall the code would be more robust?
> fmt_free(fmt);
> }
>
> /* reset sort keys */
> perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list_safe(list, fmt, tmp) {
> - list_del_init(&fmt->list);
> - list_del_init(&fmt->sort_list);
> + list_del(&fmt->sort_list);
Ditto, just ditch what you said you would do in the cset comment, i.e.
ditch the extra "list_del_init(&fmt->list);" call, no?
- Arnaldo
> fmt_free(fmt);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.9.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Remove extra list_del_init calls in list reset |
| Message-ID | <tNyb8-32h-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1655118 |
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:02:26AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 01:17:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > We only needs to remove the format from the currently
> > iterated list. The other removals/inits are superfluous
> > because we free the format in any case.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-8umo89ntt3kawmfwsivav43t@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> > index feb2174ddd1f..a0fee2ac8599 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> > @@ -614,15 +614,15 @@ void perf_hpp__reset_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list)
> >
> > /* reset output fields */
> > perf_hpp_list__for_each_format_safe(list, fmt, tmp) {
> > - list_del_init(&fmt->list);
> > - list_del_init(&fmt->sort_list);
> > + list_del(&fmt->list);
> > + /* Remove the fmt from next loop processing. */
> > + list_del(&fmt->sort_list);
>
> Why not just add the comment and leave it as list_del_init(), then, in
> fmt_free() -> fmt->free() -> hse_free() (for instance), have:
>
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->list));
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->sort_list));
>
> The patch would be smaller and overall the code would be more robust?
ok, that could catch something.. will change
thanks,
jirka
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web