Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1655006 > unrolled thread

Please, consider using lzip instead of xz

Started byAntonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@gnu.org>
First post2017-06-01 13:00 +0200
Last post2017-06-01 13:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  Please, consider using lzip instead of xz Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@gnu.org> - 2017-06-01 13:00 +0200

#1655006 — Please, consider using lzip instead of xz

FromAntonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@gnu.org>
Date2017-06-01 13:00 +0200
SubjectPlease, consider using lzip instead of xz
Message-ID<tNvZD-1vK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
(I'm not subscribed to the list. Please CC me.)

Dear Linux developers,

In 2010 Laszlo Ersek recommended[1] the plzip program to compress Linux 
tarballs. However his advice went unnoticed, and Linux developers chose 
xz instead.

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/21/202

Now I would like to present new evidence in favor of Laszlo's 
recommendation. Please, see it at
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html ,
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/lzip_benchmark.html#xz2 and
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/plzip_benchmark.html

Please, could you reconsider your decision and use lzip instead of xz 
for the compression of Linux tarballs?


Thanks,
Antonio.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web