Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1655006 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-01 13:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-01 13:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Please, consider using lzip instead of xz Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@gnu.org> - 2017-06-01 13:00 +0200
| From | Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Please, consider using lzip instead of xz |
| Message-ID | <tNvZD-1vK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
(I'm not subscribed to the list. Please CC me.) Dear Linux developers, In 2010 Laszlo Ersek recommended[1] the plzip program to compress Linux tarballs. However his advice went unnoticed, and Linux developers chose xz instead. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/21/202 Now I would like to present new evidence in favor of Laszlo's recommendation. Please, see it at http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html , http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/lzip_benchmark.html#xz2 and http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/plzip_benchmark.html Please, could you reconsider your decision and use lzip instead of xz for the compression of Linux tarballs? Thanks, Antonio.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web