Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1652817 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-30 07:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-01 09:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-05-30 07:40 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 16:10 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-06-01 09:40 +0200
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-30 07:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API |
| Message-ID | <tMI2R-2WP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
+to peterz@infradead.org
+to mingo@kernel.org
+to rostedt@goodmis.org
I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq_work.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index bcf107c..e2ebe8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -138,11 +138,7 @@ static void irq_work_run_list(struct llist_head *list)
> return;
>
> llnode = llist_del_all(list);
> - while (llnode != NULL) {
> - work = llist_entry(llnode, struct irq_work, llnode);
> -
> - llnode = llist_next(llnode);
> -
> + llist_for_each_entry(work, llnode, llnode) {
> /*
> * Clear the PENDING bit, after this point the @work
> * can be re-used.
> --
> 1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-31 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNctZ-5S4-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1652817 |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used. > > +to peterz@infradead.org > +to mingo@kernel.org > +to rostedt@goodmis.org > > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to.. > Could you check this if you are right person? I'll take it. Thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNsS5-81U-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1654277 |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used. > > > > +to peterz@infradead.org > > +to mingo@kernel.org > > +to rostedt@goodmis.org > > > > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to.. > > Could you check this if you are right person? > > I'll take it. Hi, Frederic, Thank you.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web