Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1656101 > unrolled thread

RE: [PATCH v4 3/3] USB3/DWC3: Enable undefined length INCR burst type

Started byFelipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
First post2017-06-02 12:10 +0200
Last post2017-06-02 12:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  RE: [PATCH v4 3/3] USB3/DWC3: Enable undefined length INCR burst type Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-06-02 12:10 +0200

#1656101 — RE: [PATCH v4 3/3] USB3/DWC3: Enable undefined length INCR burst type

FromFelipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-02 12:10 +0200
SubjectRE: [PATCH v4 3/3] USB3/DWC3: Enable undefined length INCR burst type
Message-ID<tNRGP-82M-25@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@nxp.com> writes:
>> Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@nxp.com> writes:
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> 1.7.9.5
>> >> > Hi, Balbi and all guys,
>> >> > Any comment for these patches? Can they be accepted?
>> >>
>> >> Rob had comments which you didn't reply yet. I cannot take this
>> >> patchset yet ;-)
>> >>
>> > Balbi,
>> >
>> > I look into his mail again, which was based v3, and I replied it.
>> >
>> > He had different understanding for undefined length burst mode.
>> >
>> > It seems he think for this mode, just setting bit[0] (INCRBrstEna) and
>> > don't need to set other field.
>> >
>> > However, according to the DWC USB3.0 controller databook, when it is
>> > undefined length INCR burst mode, we still need to set one max burst
>> > type, such as INCR8, which means controller will use any length less
>> > than or equal to this INCR8.
>> 
>> Rob, do you agree with the patch now?
>> 
>> --
>> balbi
>
> Hi, Balbi,
> Any comment for these patches? Or any chance to merge them?

I'm not sure you understand how development is carried out here. I
*can't* apply patches touching Device Tree properties without an
Acked-by from any of the Device Tree maintainers. Until then, there's
nothing I can say/do.

-- 
balbi

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web