Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1655563 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 3.2 075/101] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming ESN size harder

Started byBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
First post2017-06-01 19:10 +0200
Last post2017-06-01 19:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 3.2 075/101] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming  ESN size harder Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-01 19:10 +0200

#1655563 — [PATCH 3.2 075/101] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming ESN size harder

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2017-06-01 19:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 3.2 075/101] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming ESN size harder
Message-ID<tNBLI-5r9-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
3.2.89-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>

commit f843ee6dd019bcece3e74e76ad9df0155655d0df upstream.

Kees Cook has pointed out that xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() is subject to
wrapping issues.  To ensure we are correctly ensuring that the two ESN
structures are the same size compare both the overall size as reported
by xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() and the internal length are the same.

CVE-2017-7184
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -390,7 +390,11 @@ static inline int xfrm_replay_verify_len
 	up = nla_data(rp);
 	ulen = xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(up);
 
-	if (nla_len(rp) < ulen || xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen)
+	/* Check the overall length and the internal bitmap length to avoid
+	 * potential overflow. */
+	if (nla_len(rp) < ulen ||
+	    xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen ||
+	    replay_esn->bmp_len != up->bmp_len)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (up->replay_window > up->bmp_len * sizeof(__u32) * 8)

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web