Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1651306 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)

Started byAndré Draszik <git@andred.net>
First post2017-05-26 13:10 +0200
Last post2017-05-31 07:20 +0200
Articles 8 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) André Draszik <git@andred.net> - 2017-05-26 13:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-26 13:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 16:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-28 18:40 +0200
    [PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) André Draszik <git@andred.net> - 2017-05-26 13:20 +0200
    [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) André Draszik <git@andred.net> - 2017-05-26 13:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-26 13:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk> - 2017-05-31 07:20 +0200

#1651306 — [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)

FromAndré Draszik <git@andred.net>
Date2017-05-26 13:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)
Message-ID<tLli2-57l-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:

  (gdb) lx-dmesg
  Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
  Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
  (gdb) p log_buf
  $15 = 0x0

Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
  https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html

  (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
  All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":

  File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
  static char *log_buf;

  File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
  static char *log_buf;
  (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
  $1 = 0x0
  (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
  $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""

By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
for the other symbols we need from printk.c

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
---
 scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
index f9b92ece7834..11f2397d40ed 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
         super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
 
     def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
-        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
-        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
-        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
-        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
+        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
+        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
+        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
+        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
 
         inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
         start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1651309

FromJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Date2017-05-26 13:20 +0200
Message-ID<tLlrH-5bT-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651306
On 2017-05-26 13:04, André Draszik wrote:
> lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
> Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
> verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
> happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
> 
>   (gdb) lx-dmesg
>   Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
>   Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
>   (gdb) p log_buf
>   $15 = 0x0
> 
> Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
>   https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
> 
>   (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
>   All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
> 
>   File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
>   static char *log_buf;
> 
>   File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
>   static char *log_buf;
>   (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
>   $1 = 0x0
>   (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
>   $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
> 
> By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
> can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
> for the other symbols we need from printk.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
> ---
>  scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> index f9b92ece7834..11f2397d40ed 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
>          super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
>  
>      def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
> -        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
> -        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
> -        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
> -        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
> +        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)

Overlong line. Please stay pep8 compliant.

> +        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
> +        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
> +        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
>  
>          inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
>          start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
> 

Looks good otherwise, thanks for addressing this!

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1651891

FromAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-27 16:10 +0200
Message-ID<tLKzL-52e-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651309
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-05-26 13:04, André Draszik wrote:

>> +        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>
> Overlong line. Please stay pep8 compliant.

What I heard from colleague of mine couple of years ago, they (their
team) moved to 100 characters in Python scripts because of somehow
stupid recommendations from last century.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1652173

FromJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Date2017-05-28 18:40 +0200
Message-ID<tM9ot-4pq-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651891
On 2017-05-27 16:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-05-26 13:04, André Draszik wrote:
> 
>>> +        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>>
>> Overlong line. Please stay pep8 compliant.
> 
> What I heard from colleague of mine couple of years ago, they (their
> team) moved to 100 characters in Python scripts because of somehow
> stupid recommendations from last century.

Well, it happens to be in line with the kernel preference for C code. We
can discuss a different style when the kernel relaxes its own. ;)

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1651310 — [PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)

FromAndré Draszik <git@andred.net>
Date2017-05-26 13:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)
Message-ID<tLlrH-5bT-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651306
lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:

  (gdb) lx-dmesg
  Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
  Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
  (gdb) p log_buf
  $15 = 0x0

Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
  https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html

  (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
  All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":

  File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
  static char *log_buf;

  File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
  static char *log_buf;
  (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
  $1 = 0x0
  (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
  $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
  (gdb) p &log_buf
  $3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
  (gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
  $4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
  (gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
  $5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>

By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
for the other symbols we need from printk.c

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>

---
v2: Commit message slightly updated
---
 scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
index f9b92ece7834..11f2397d40ed 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
         super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
 
     def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
-        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
-        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
-        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
-        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
+        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
+        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
+        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
+        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
 
         inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
         start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1651320 — [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)

FromAndré Draszik <git@andred.net>
Date2017-05-26 13:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)
Message-ID<tLlBn-5fg-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651306
lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:

  (gdb) lx-dmesg
  Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
  Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
  (gdb) p log_buf
  $15 = 0x0

Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
  https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html

  (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
  All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":

  File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
  static char *log_buf;

  File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
  static char *log_buf;
  (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
  $1 = 0x0
  (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
  $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
  (gdb) p &log_buf
  $3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
  (gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
  $4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
  (gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
  $5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>

By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
for the other symbols we need from printk.c

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>

---
v3: pep8 compliant
v2: Commit message slightly updated
---
 scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
index f9b92ece7834..5afd1098e33a 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
@@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
         super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
 
     def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
-        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
-        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
-        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
-        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
+        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval(
+            "'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
+        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
+        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
+        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
 
         inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
         start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1651333 — Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)

FromJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Date2017-05-26 13:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)
Message-ID<tLlL4-5kc-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651320
On 2017-05-26 13:22, André Draszik wrote:
> lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
> Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
> verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
> happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
> 
>   (gdb) lx-dmesg
>   Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
>   Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
>   (gdb) p log_buf
>   $15 = 0x0
> 
> Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
>   https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
> 
>   (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
>   All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
> 
>   File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
>   static char *log_buf;
> 
>   File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
>   static char *log_buf;
>   (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
>   $1 = 0x0
>   (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
>   $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
>   (gdb) p &log_buf
>   $3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
>   (gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
>   $4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
>   (gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
>   $5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>
> 
> By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
> can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
> for the other symbols we need from printk.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
> 
> ---
> v3: pep8 compliant
> v2: Commit message slightly updated
> ---
>  scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> index f9b92ece7834..5afd1098e33a 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
>          super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
>  
>      def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
> -        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
> -        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
> -        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
> -        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
> +        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval(
> +            "'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
> +        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
> +        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
> +        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
>  
>          inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
>          start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
> 

Acked-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

Andrew, please include in your queue.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1653834 — Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)

FromKieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk>
Date2017-05-31 07:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably)
Message-ID<tN4d3-sq-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1651333
Hi André, Jan, Andrew,

On 26/05/17 20:28, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-05-26 13:22, André Draszik wrote:
>> lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
>> Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
>> verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
>> happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
>>
>>   (gdb) lx-dmesg
>>   Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
>>   Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
>>   (gdb) p log_buf
>>   $15 = 0x0
>>
>> Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
>>   https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
>>
>>   (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
>>   All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
>>
>>   File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
>>   static char *log_buf;
>>
>>   File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
>>   static char *log_buf;
>>   (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
>>   $1 = 0x0
>>   (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
>>   $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
>>   (gdb) p &log_buf
>>   $3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
>>   (gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
>>   $4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
>>   (gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
>>   $5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>
>>
>> By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
>> can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
>> for the other symbols we need from printk.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>

Nice to see you again André :D

>> ---
>> v3: pep8 compliant
>> v2: Commit message slightly updated
>> ---
>>  scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 9 +++++----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
>> index f9b92ece7834..5afd1098e33a 100644
>> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
>> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
>> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
>>          super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
>>  
>>      def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
>> -        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>> -        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
>> -        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
>> -        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
>> +        log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval(
>> +            "'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>> +        log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
>> +        log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
>> +        log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
>>  
>>          inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
>>          start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
>>
> 
> Acked-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

Sorry for the delay - I'm in Tokyo for Linux OSS Japan.

This looks good to me and I've verified it locally.

Tested-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran@bingham.xyz>

> 
> Andrew, please include in your queue.
>
> Jan
> 

-- 
Regards

Kieran Bingham

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web