Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1651306 > unrolled thread
| Started by | André Draszik <git@andred.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-26 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-31 07:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) André Draszik <git@andred.net> - 2017-05-26 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-26 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-28 18:40 +0200
[PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) André Draszik <git@andred.net> - 2017-05-26 13:20 +0200
[PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) André Draszik <git@andred.net> - 2017-05-26 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-26 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk> - 2017-05-31 07:20 +0200
| From | André Draszik <git@andred.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) |
| Message-ID | <tLli2-57l-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
(gdb) lx-dmesg
Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
(gdb) p log_buf
$15 = 0x0
Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
(gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
static char *log_buf;
File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
static char *log_buf;
(gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
$1 = 0x0
(gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
$2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
for the other symbols we need from printk.c
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
---
scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
index f9b92ece7834..11f2397d40ed 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
- log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
- log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
- log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
- log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
+ log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
+ log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
+ log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
+ log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLlrH-5bT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651306 |
On 2017-05-26 13:04, André Draszik wrote:
> lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
> Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
> verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
> happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
>
> (gdb) lx-dmesg
> Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
> Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
> (gdb) p log_buf
> $15 = 0x0
>
> Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
>
> (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
> All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
>
> File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
> static char *log_buf;
>
> File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
> static char *log_buf;
> (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
> $1 = 0x0
> (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
> $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
>
> By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
> can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
> for the other symbols we need from printk.c
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
> ---
> scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> index f9b92ece7834..11f2397d40ed 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
> super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
>
> def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
> - log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
> - log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
> - log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
> - log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
> + log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
Overlong line. Please stay pep8 compliant.
> + log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
> + log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
> + log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
>
> inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
> start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
>
Looks good otherwise, thanks for addressing this!
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-27 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLKzL-52e-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651309 |
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-05-26 13:04, André Draszik wrote:
>> + log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>
> Overlong line. Please stay pep8 compliant.
What I heard from colleague of mine couple of years ago, they (their
team) moved to 100 characters in Python scripts because of somehow
stupid recommendations from last century.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-28 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tM9ot-4pq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651891 |
On 2017-05-27 16:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-05-26 13:04, André Draszik wrote:
>
>>> + log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>>
>> Overlong line. Please stay pep8 compliant.
>
> What I heard from colleague of mine couple of years ago, they (their
> team) moved to 100 characters in Python scripts because of somehow
> stupid recommendations from last century.
Well, it happens to be in line with the kernel preference for C code. We
can discuss a different style when the kernel relaxes its own. ;)
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | André Draszik <git@andred.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 13:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) |
| Message-ID | <tLlrH-5bT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651306 |
lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
(gdb) lx-dmesg
Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
(gdb) p log_buf
$15 = 0x0
Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
(gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
static char *log_buf;
File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
static char *log_buf;
(gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
$1 = 0x0
(gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
$2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
(gdb) p &log_buf
$3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
(gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
$4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
(gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
$5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>
By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
for the other symbols we need from printk.c
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
---
v2: Commit message slightly updated
---
scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
index f9b92ece7834..11f2397d40ed 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
- log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
- log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
- log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
- log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
+ log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
+ log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
+ log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
+ log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | André Draszik <git@andred.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 13:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) |
| Message-ID | <tLlBn-5fg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651306 |
lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
(gdb) lx-dmesg
Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
(gdb) p log_buf
$15 = 0x0
Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
(gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
static char *log_buf;
File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
static char *log_buf;
(gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
$1 = 0x0
(gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
$2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
(gdb) p &log_buf
$3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
(gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
$4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
(gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
$5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>
By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
for the other symbols we need from printk.c
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
---
v3: pep8 compliant
v2: Commit message slightly updated
---
scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
index f9b92ece7834..5afd1098e33a 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
@@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
- log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
- log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
- log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
- log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
+ log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval(
+ "'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
+ log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
+ log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
+ log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 13:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) |
| Message-ID | <tLlL4-5kc-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651320 |
On 2017-05-26 13:22, André Draszik wrote:
> lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
> Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
> verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
> happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
>
> (gdb) lx-dmesg
> Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
> Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
> (gdb) p log_buf
> $15 = 0x0
>
> Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
>
> (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
> All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
>
> File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
> static char *log_buf;
>
> File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
> static char *log_buf;
> (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
> $1 = 0x0
> (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
> $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
> (gdb) p &log_buf
> $3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
> (gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
> $4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
> (gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
> $5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>
>
> By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
> can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
> for the other symbols we need from printk.c
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
>
> ---
> v3: pep8 compliant
> v2: Commit message slightly updated
> ---
> scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> index f9b92ece7834..5afd1098e33a 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
> super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
>
> def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
> - log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
> - log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
> - log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
> - log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
> + log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval(
> + "'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
> + log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
> + log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
> + log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
>
> inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
> start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
>
Acked-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Andrew, please include in your queue.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-31 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: make lx-dmesg command work (reliably) |
| Message-ID | <tN4d3-sq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651333 |
Hi André, Jan, Andrew,
On 26/05/17 20:28, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-05-26 13:22, André Draszik wrote:
>> lx-dmesg needs access to the log_buf symbol from printk.c.
>> Unfortunately, the symbol log_buf also exists in BPF's
>> verifier.c and hence gdb can pick one or the other. If it
>> happens to pick BPF's log_buf, lx-dmesg doesn't work:
>>
>> (gdb) lx-dmesg
>> Python Exception <class 'gdb.MemoryError'> Cannot access memory at address 0x0:
>> Error occurred in Python command: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
>> (gdb) p log_buf
>> $15 = 0x0
>>
>> Luckily, GDB has a way to deal with this, see
>> https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Symbols.html
>>
>> (gdb) info variables ^log_buf$
>> All variables matching regular expression "^log_buf$":
>>
>> File <linux.git>/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:
>> static char *log_buf;
>>
>> File <linux.git>/kernel/printk/printk.c:
>> static char *log_buf;
>> (gdb) p 'verifier.c'::log_buf
>> $1 = 0x0
>> (gdb) p 'printk.c'::log_buf
>> $2 = 0x811a6aa0 <__log_buf> ""
>> (gdb) p &log_buf
>> $3 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
>> (gdb) p &'verifier.c'::log_buf
>> $4 = (char **) 0x8120fe40 <log_buf>
>> (gdb) p &'printk.c'::log_buf
>> $5 = (char **) 0x8048b7d0 <log_buf>
>>
>> By being explicit about the location of the symbol, we
>> can make lx-dmesg work again. While at it, do the same
>> for the other symbols we need from printk.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
Nice to see you again André :D
>> ---
>> v3: pep8 compliant
>> v2: Commit message slightly updated
>> ---
>> scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
>> index f9b92ece7834..5afd1098e33a 100644
>> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
>> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/dmesg.py
>> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ class LxDmesg(gdb.Command):
>> super(LxDmesg, self).__init__("lx-dmesg", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
>>
>> def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
>> - log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>> - log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_first_idx"))
>> - log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_next_idx"))
>> - log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("log_buf_len"))
>> + log_buf_addr = int(str(gdb.parse_and_eval(
>> + "'printk.c'::log_buf")).split()[0], 16)
>> + log_first_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_first_idx"))
>> + log_next_idx = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_next_idx"))
>> + log_buf_len = int(gdb.parse_and_eval("'printk.c'::log_buf_len"))
>>
>> inf = gdb.inferiors()[0]
>> start = log_buf_addr + log_first_idx
>>
>
> Acked-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Sorry for the delay - I'm in Tokyo for Linux OSS Japan.
This looks good to me and I've verified it locally.
Tested-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran@bingham.xyz>
>
> Andrew, please include in your queue.
>
> Jan
>
--
Regards
Kieran Bingham
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web