Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1651462 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-26 18:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: exar: Refactor address and bit calculations Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> - 2017-05-26 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: exar: Refactor address and bit calculations Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: exar: Refactor address and bit calculations Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-29 14:40 +0200
| From | Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: exar: Refactor address and bit calculations |
| Message-ID | <tLpYn-83M-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Make the address and bit calculation more friendly for introducing a
"first pin" offset later on. The new form is also more compact and
regular.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c
index 1a629831d45b..d13bf20b8639 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@ static void exar_update(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int reg, int val,
static int exar_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, int direction,
unsigned int offset)
{
- unsigned int bank = offset / 8;
- unsigned int addr;
+ unsigned int addr = offset / 8 ?
+ EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_LO;
+ unsigned int bit = offset % 8;
- addr = bank ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_LO;
- exar_update(chip, addr, direction, offset % 8);
+ exar_update(chip, addr, direction, bit);
return 0;
}
@@ -73,36 +73,30 @@ static int exar_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int reg)
static int exar_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
{
- unsigned int bank = offset / 8;
- unsigned int addr;
- int val;
+ unsigned int addr = offset / 8 ?
+ EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_LO;
+ unsigned int bit = offset % 8;
- addr = bank ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_LO;
- val = exar_get(chip, addr) & BIT(offset % 8);
-
- return !!val;
+ return !!(exar_get(chip, addr) & BIT(bit));
}
static int exar_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
{
- unsigned int bank = offset / 8;
- unsigned int addr;
- int val;
-
- addr = bank ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO;
- val = exar_get(chip, addr) & BIT(offset % 8);
+ unsigned int addr = offset / 8 ?
+ EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO;
+ unsigned int bit = offset % 8;
- return !!val;
+ return !!(exar_get(chip, addr) & BIT(bit));
}
static void exar_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
int value)
{
- unsigned int bank = offset / 8;
- unsigned int addr;
+ unsigned int addr = offset / 8 ?
+ EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO;
+ unsigned int bit = offset % 8;
- addr = bank ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO;
- exar_update(chip, addr, value, offset % 8);
+ exar_update(chip, addr, value, bit);
}
static int exar_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
--
2.12.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-27 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLKgp-4Gs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651462 |
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: > Make the address and bit calculation more friendly for introducing a > "first pin" offset later on. The new form is also more compact and > regular. I think this should be folded to patch 9 since the latter touches near all lines you touched here. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tMs7M-8i4-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651462 |
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: > Make the address and bit calculation more friendly for introducing a > "first pin" offset later on. The new form is also more compact and > regular. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Whether you go with a separate patch or as Andy suggests. Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web