Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1652457 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-29 14:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-04 16:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-29 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-04 16:00 +0200
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-29 14:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained |
| Message-ID | <tMrv4-7MV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > The AMD pinctrl driver uses a chained interrupt to demultiplex the GPIO > interrupts. Kevin Vandeventer reported, that his new AMD Ryzen locks up > hard on boot when the AMD pinctrl driver is initialized. The reason is an > interrupt storm. It's not clear whether that's caused by hardware or > firmware or both. > > Using chained interrupts on X86 is a dangerous endavour. If a system is > misconfigured or the hardware buggy there is no safety net to catch an > interrupt storm. > > Convert the driver to use a regular interrupt for the demultiplex > handler. This allows the interrupt storm detector to catch the malfunction > and lets the system boot up. > > This should be backported to stable because it's likely that more users run > into this problem as the AMD Ryzen machines are spreading. > > Reported-by: Kevin Vandeventer > Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034261 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Patch applied for fixes. Hm, I wonder if there is a bunch of other x86 drivers that should just request the IRQ? Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tOEeu-5Rg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1652457 |
On Mon, 29 May 2017, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > The AMD pinctrl driver uses a chained interrupt to demultiplex the GPIO > > interrupts. Kevin Vandeventer reported, that his new AMD Ryzen locks up > > hard on boot when the AMD pinctrl driver is initialized. The reason is an > > interrupt storm. It's not clear whether that's caused by hardware or > > firmware or both. > > > > Using chained interrupts on X86 is a dangerous endavour. If a system is > > misconfigured or the hardware buggy there is no safety net to catch an > > interrupt storm. > > > > Convert the driver to use a regular interrupt for the demultiplex > > handler. This allows the interrupt storm detector to catch the malfunction > > and lets the system boot up. > > > > This should be backported to stable because it's likely that more users run > > into this problem as the AMD Ryzen machines are spreading. > > > > Reported-by: Kevin Vandeventer > > Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034261 > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > Patch applied for fixes. > > Hm, I wonder if there is a bunch of other x86 drivers that should just > request the IRQ? For sanity reasons I think so. chained interrupts are fine if you have bootloader, device tree and kernel under control. Once BIOS/UEFI comes into play the user is helpless against this kind of wreckage. We'll get that same joy with ARM64 sooner than later. Thanks, tglx
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web