Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1652345 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 11:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-05-30 13:20 +0200

#1652345 — Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:47 PM,  <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
>
> Processing queue full of TLB invalidation commands might
> take more time on some platforms than current timeout
> of 100us. So increased drain timeout value.
>
> Also now udelay time is increased exponentially for each poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
> ---
>
> v2
> - Addressed Will's and Robin's comments i.e
>   increased poll timeout only for drain case and removed spin loop
>   whose logic anyway is screwed up.
> - Also changed commit subject and message as this patch no longer
>   exactly reflects what is done in SMMU driver i.e
>   8513c8930069 iommu/arm-smmu: Poll for TLB sync completion more effectively
>
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index d412bdd..cbc8309 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@
>  #define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_NONE            (0UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
>  #define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV             (2UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
>
> +#define CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US          1000
> +
>  /* Event queue */
>  #define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS                        4
>  #define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT              7
> @@ -737,7 +739,12 @@ static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
>   */
>  static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
>  {
> -       ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> +       ktime_t timeout;
> +       unsigned int delay = 1;
> +
> +       /* Wait longer if it's queue drain */
> +       timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), drain ? CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US :
> +                                                   ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
>
>         while (queue_sync_cons(q), (drain ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
>                 if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
> @@ -747,7 +754,11 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
>                         wfe();
>                 } else {
>                         cpu_relax();
> -                       udelay(1);
> +                       udelay(delay);
> +                       /* No point in sleeping for fixed time,
> +                        * if cons isn't moving fast.
> +                        */
> +                       delay *= 2;
>                 }
>         }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Gentle reminder for patch review.

Thanks,
Sunil.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1653120

Hi Sunil,

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 02:41:59PM +0530, Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:47 PM,  <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
> >
> > Processing queue full of TLB invalidation commands might
> > take more time on some platforms than current timeout
> > of 100us. So increased drain timeout value.
> >
> > Also now udelay time is increased exponentially for each poll.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>

[...]

> Gentle reminder for patch review.

Sorry, I forgot to push this out. Should be on my iommu/devel branch now.

Will

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web