Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1653539 > unrolled thread

Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from  handlers Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2017-05-30 22:10 +0200
    Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 09:10 +0200
    Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-31 09:30 +0200

#1653539 — Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers

On Mon, 22 May 2017, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On la, 2017-05-20 at 10:56 +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:
> > "J. R. Okajima":
> > > 
> > > I don't know whether the fix is good to me or not yet. I will test your
> > > fix, but I am busy now and my test will be a few weeks later. Other
> > > people may want the fix soon. So I'd suggest you to reproduce the
> > > problem on your side. I guess "mem=1G" or "mem=512M" will make it easier
> > > to reproduce the problem.
> > > Of course, if you are sure the fix is correct, then you don't have to
> > > wait for my test. Release it soon for other people.
> > 
> > Now I am going to able to run my local test.
> > But V3 patch failed to apply onto v4.11.0.
> > 
> > Would you provide us two versions of the patch, one for v4.11 series and
> > the other of v4.12-rcN?
> 
> For v4.12-rc2 the backport is here:
> 
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/156990/

This fix seems to have got lost: we've been waiting a month,
and 4.12 is now at rc3: please expedite the unexpedited :)

Thanks,
Hugh

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1653896 — Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers

On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2017, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>> On la, 2017-05-20 at 10:56 +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:
>> > "J. R. Okajima":
>> > > 
>> > > I don't know whether the fix is good to me or not yet. I will test your
>> > > fix, but I am busy now and my test will be a few weeks later. Other
>> > > people may want the fix soon. So I'd suggest you to reproduce the
>> > > problem on your side. I guess "mem=1G" or "mem=512M" will make it easier
>> > > to reproduce the problem.
>> > > Of course, if you are sure the fix is correct, then you don't have to
>> > > wait for my test. Release it soon for other people.
>> > 
>> > Now I am going to able to run my local test.
>> > But V3 patch failed to apply onto v4.11.0.
>> > 
>> > Would you provide us two versions of the patch, one for v4.11 series and
>> > the other of v4.12-rcN?
>> 
>> For v4.12-rc2 the backport is here:
>> 
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/156990/
>
> This fix seems to have got lost: we've been waiting a month,
> and 4.12 is now at rc3: please expedite the unexpedited :)

It's included in my latest pull request to Dave [1], should make it to
v4.12-rc4.

BR,
Jani.


[1] http://mid.mail-archive.com/877f0zlr5d.fsf@intel.com


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1653929 — Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers

On ti, 2017-05-30 at 13:00 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2017, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > On la, 2017-05-20 at 10:56 +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:
> > > "J. R. Okajima":
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know whether the fix is good to me or not yet. I will test your
> > > > fix, but I am busy now and my test will be a few weeks later. Other
> > > > people may want the fix soon. So I'd suggest you to reproduce the
> > > > problem on your side. I guess "mem=1G" or "mem=512M" will make it easier
> > > > to reproduce the problem.
> > > > Of course, if you are sure the fix is correct, then you don't have to
> > > > wait for my test. Release it soon for other people.
> > > 
> > > Now I am going to able to run my local test.
> > > But V3 patch failed to apply onto v4.11.0.
> > > 
> > > Would you provide us two versions of the patch, one for v4.11 series and
> > > the other of v4.12-rcN?
> > 
> > For v4.12-rc2 the backport is here:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/156990/
> 
> This fix seems to have got lost: we've been waiting a month,
> and 4.12 is now at rc3: please expedite the unexpedited :)

Don't worry, it's not lost. It was merged to drm-intel-fixes and thus is in the pipeline.

There were some unexpected delays getting fixes in, sorry for that.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web