Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1653352 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock

Started byPhil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
First post2017-05-30 18:30 +0200
Last post2017-06-01 10:50 +0200
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> - 2017-05-30 18:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> - 2017-05-30 21:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> - 2017-05-31 10:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> - 2017-05-31 11:30 +0200
    [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> - 2017-05-31 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2017-05-31 23:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> - 2017-06-01 10:50 +0200

#1653352 — [PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock

FromPhil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
Date2017-05-30 18:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock
Message-ID<tMSbT-1dJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.

Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.

Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
(currently just PCM).

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
---
 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
index facc346..e0ce5e7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
 
 	bool is_vpu_clock;
 	bool is_mash_clock;
+	bool low_jitter;
 
 	u32 tcnt_mux;
 };
@@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 							int parent_idx,
 							unsigned long rate,
 							u32 *div,
-							unsigned long *prate)
+							unsigned long *prate,
+							unsigned long *avgrate)
 {
 	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
 	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
@@ -1136,11 +1138,33 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
 
 	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
+		unsigned long tmp_rate;
+
 		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
 		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
 
-		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
-						       *div);
+		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
+		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
+
+		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
+			unsigned long high, low;
+			u32 idiv = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
+
+			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
+							       idiv);
+			idiv += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
+			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
+							      idiv);
+
+			/* Return a value which is the maximum deviation
+			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
+			 */
+			if ((tmp_rate - low) < (high - tmp_rate))
+				tmp_rate = low;
+			else
+				tmp_rate -= high - tmp_rate;
+		}
+		return tmp_rate;
 	}
 
 	if (data->frac_bits)
@@ -1167,6 +1191,7 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 
 	*div = curdiv << CM_DIV_FRAC_BITS;
 	*prate = curdiv * best_rate;
+	*avgrate = best_rate;
 
 	return best_rate;
 }
@@ -1178,6 +1203,7 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	bool current_parent_is_pllc;
 	unsigned long rate, best_rate = 0;
 	unsigned long prate, best_prate = 0;
+	unsigned long avgrate, best_avgrate = 0;
 	size_t i;
 	u32 div;
 
@@ -1202,11 +1228,13 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 			continue;
 
 		rate = bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(hw, i, req->rate,
-							  &div, &prate);
+							  &div, &prate,
+							  &avgrate);
 		if (rate > best_rate && rate <= req->rate) {
 			best_parent = parent;
 			best_prate = prate;
 			best_rate = rate;
+			best_avgrate = avgrate;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1216,7 +1244,7 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	req->best_parent_hw = best_parent;
 	req->best_parent_rate = best_prate;
 
-	req->rate = best_rate;
+	req->rate = best_avgrate;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2010,6 +2038,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clk_desc {
 		.int_bits = 12,
 		.frac_bits = 12,
 		.is_mash_clock = true,
+		.low_jitter = true,
 		.parents = bcm2835_pcm_per_parents,
 		.tcnt_mux = 23),
 	[BCM2835_CLOCK_PWM]	= REGISTER_PER_CLK(
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1653506

FromStefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Date2017-05-30 21:10 +0200
Message-ID<tMUGK-2PS-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1653352
Hi Phil,

> Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> hat am 30. Mai 2017 um 18:28 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
> with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.
> 
> Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
> average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
> better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
> worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.
> 
> Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
> (currently just PCM).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> index facc346..e0ce5e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
>  
>  	bool is_vpu_clock;
>  	bool is_mash_clock;
> +	bool low_jitter;
>  
>  	u32 tcnt_mux;
>  };
> @@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  							int parent_idx,
>  							unsigned long rate,
>  							u32 *div,
> -							unsigned long *prate)
> +							unsigned long *prate,
> +							unsigned long *avgrate)
>  {
>  	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
>  	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
> @@ -1136,11 +1138,33 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
>  
>  	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
> +		unsigned long tmp_rate;
> +
>  		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>  		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
>  
> -		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
> -						       *div);
> +		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
> +		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
> +
> +		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
> +			unsigned long high, low;
> +			u32 idiv = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
> +
> +			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
> +							       idiv);
> +			idiv += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
> +			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
> +							      idiv);

What about int_div or intdiv instead of idiv as variable name?

> +
> +			/* Return a value which is the maximum deviation
> +			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
> +			 */

Please fix coding style of the comment.

Thanks
Stefan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1653997

FromPhil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
Date2017-05-31 10:40 +0200
Message-ID<tN7kB-2mN-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1653506
Hi Stefan,

On 30/05/2017 20:04, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
>> Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> hat am 30. Mai 2017 um 18:28 geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
>> with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.
>>
>> Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
>> average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
>> better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
>> worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.
>>
>> Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
>> (currently just PCM).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> index facc346..e0ce5e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
>>  
>>  	bool is_vpu_clock;
>>  	bool is_mash_clock;
>> +	bool low_jitter;
>>  
>>  	u32 tcnt_mux;
>>  };
>> @@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>  							int parent_idx,
>>  							unsigned long rate,
>>  							u32 *div,
>> -							unsigned long *prate)
>> +							unsigned long *prate,
>> +							unsigned long *avgrate)
>>  {
>>  	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
>>  	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
>> @@ -1136,11 +1138,33 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>  	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
>>  
>>  	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
>> +		unsigned long tmp_rate;
>> +
>>  		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>>  		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
>>  
>> -		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>> -						       *div);
>> +		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
>> +		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
>> +
>> +		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
>> +			unsigned long high, low;
>> +			u32 idiv = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
>> +
>> +			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>> +							       idiv);
>> +			idiv += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
>> +			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>> +							      idiv);
> 
> What about int_div or intdiv instead of idiv as variable name?

OK - int_div matches tmp_rate.

>> +
>> +			/* Return a value which is the maximum deviation
>> +			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
>> +			 */
> 
> Please fix coding style of the comment.

Oops. I'm surprised checkpatch didn't complain about that.

Thanks,

Phil

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1654043

FromStefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Date2017-05-31 11:30 +0200
Message-ID<tN86Z-2UY-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1653997
Am 31.05.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Phil Elwell:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 30/05/2017 20:04, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>>> Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> hat am 30. Mai 2017 um 18:28 geschrieben:
>>>
>>>
>>> Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
>>> with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.
>>>
>>> Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
>>> average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
>>> better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
>>> worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.
>>>
>>> Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
>>> (currently just PCM).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>>> index facc346..e0ce5e7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>>> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
>>>  
>>>  	bool is_vpu_clock;
>>>  	bool is_mash_clock;
>>> +	bool low_jitter;
>>>  
>>>  	u32 tcnt_mux;
>>>  };
>>> @@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>>  							int parent_idx,
>>>  							unsigned long rate,
>>>  							u32 *div,
>>> -							unsigned long *prate)
>>> +							unsigned long *prate,
>>> +							unsigned long *avgrate)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
>>>  	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
>>> @@ -1136,11 +1138,33 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>>  	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
>>>  
>>>  	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
>>> +		unsigned long tmp_rate;
>>> +
>>>  		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>>>  		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
>>>  
>>> -		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>>> -						       *div);
>>> +		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
>>> +		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
>>> +
>>> +		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
>>> +			unsigned long high, low;
>>> +			u32 idiv = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
>>> +
>>> +			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>>> +							       idiv);
>>> +			idiv += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
>>> +			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>>> +							      idiv);
>> What about int_div or intdiv instead of idiv as variable name?
> OK - int_div matches tmp_rate.
>
>>> +
>>> +			/* Return a value which is the maximum deviation
>>> +			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
>>> +			 */
>> Please fix coding style of the comment.
> Oops. I'm surprised checkpatch didn't complain about that.

The style above is only used for netdev.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1654033 — [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock

FromPhil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
Date2017-05-31 11:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock
Message-ID<tN7Xk-2RF-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1653352
Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.

Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.

Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
(currently just PCM).

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
---
 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
index 81ecd4c..c7ee951 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
 
 	bool is_vpu_clock;
 	bool is_mash_clock;
+	bool low_jitter;
 
 	u32 tcnt_mux;
 };
@@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 							int parent_idx,
 							unsigned long rate,
 							u32 *div,
-							unsigned long *prate)
+							unsigned long *prate,
+							unsigned long *avgrate)
 {
 	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
 	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
@@ -1136,11 +1138,34 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
 
 	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
+		unsigned long tmp_rate;
+
 		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
 		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
 
-		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
-						       *div);
+		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
+		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
+
+		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
+			unsigned long high, low;
+			u32 int_div = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
+
+			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
+							       int_div);
+			int_div += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
+			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
+							      int_div);
+
+			/*
+			 * Return a value which is the maximum deviation
+			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
+			 */
+			if ((tmp_rate - low) < (high - tmp_rate))
+				tmp_rate = low;
+			else
+				tmp_rate -= high - tmp_rate;
+		}
+		return tmp_rate;
 	}
 
 	if (data->frac_bits)
@@ -1167,6 +1192,7 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 
 	*div = curdiv << CM_DIV_FRAC_BITS;
 	*prate = curdiv * best_rate;
+	*avgrate = best_rate;
 
 	return best_rate;
 }
@@ -1178,6 +1204,7 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	bool current_parent_is_pllc;
 	unsigned long rate, best_rate = 0;
 	unsigned long prate, best_prate = 0;
+	unsigned long avgrate, best_avgrate = 0;
 	size_t i;
 	u32 div;
 
@@ -1202,11 +1229,13 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 			continue;
 
 		rate = bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(hw, i, req->rate,
-							  &div, &prate);
+							  &div, &prate,
+							  &avgrate);
 		if (rate > best_rate && rate <= req->rate) {
 			best_parent = parent;
 			best_prate = prate;
 			best_rate = rate;
+			best_avgrate = avgrate;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1216,7 +1245,7 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	req->best_parent_hw = best_parent;
 	req->best_parent_rate = best_prate;
 
-	req->rate = best_rate;
+	req->rate = best_avgrate;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2025,6 +2054,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clk_desc {
 		.int_bits = 12,
 		.frac_bits = 12,
 		.is_mash_clock = true,
+		.low_jitter = true,
 		.tcnt_mux = 23),
 	[BCM2835_CLOCK_PWM]	= REGISTER_PER_CLK(
 		.name = "pwm",
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1654640 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock

FromEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Date2017-05-31 23:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock
Message-ID<tNjvr-20L-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1654033

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> writes:

> Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
> with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.
>
> Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
> average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
> better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
> worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.

"worst" the second time

> Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
> (currently just PCM).
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> index 81ecd4c..c7ee951 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
>  
>  	bool is_vpu_clock;
>  	bool is_mash_clock;
> +	bool low_jitter;
>  
>  	u32 tcnt_mux;
>  };
> @@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  							int parent_idx,
>  							unsigned long rate,
>  							u32 *div,
> -							unsigned long *prate)
> +							unsigned long *prate,
> +							unsigned long *avgrate)
>  {
>  	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
>  	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
> @@ -1136,11 +1138,34 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
>  
>  	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
> +		unsigned long tmp_rate;
> +
>  		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>  		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
>  
> -		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
> -						       *div);
> +		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
> +		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
> +
> +		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
> +			unsigned long high, low;
> +			u32 int_div = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
> +
> +			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
> +							       int_div);
> +			int_div += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
> +			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
> +							      int_div);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Return a value which is the maximum deviation
> +			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
> +			 */
> +			if ((tmp_rate - low) < (high - tmp_rate))
> +				tmp_rate = low;
> +			else
> +				tmp_rate -= high - tmp_rate;

Simplification suggestion: Remove tmp_rate variable, just assign to
rate_from_divisor result to *avgrate.  At the end of the low_jitter
block, just "return *avgrate - max(*avgrate - low, high - *avgrate)".

With that, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1654934 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock

FromPhil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
Date2017-06-01 10:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: bcm2835: Minimise clock jitter for PCM clock
Message-ID<tNtXP-fI-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1654640
On 31/05/2017 22:36, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org> writes:
> 
>> Fractional clock dividers generate accurate average frequencies but
>> with jitter, particularly when the integer divisor is small.
>>
>> Introduce a new metric of clock accuracy to penalise clocks with a good
>> average but worse jitter compared to clocks with an average which is no
>> better but with lower jitter. The metric is the ideal rate minus the
>> worse deviation from that ideal using the nearest integer divisors.
> 
> "worst" the second time

According to the rules of English grammar, you should only use the superlative
("worst") when comparing something to a group. In this case we are only
comparing two things - the distance to the nearest-neighbour integers - so the
comparitive ("worse") is correct.

>> Use this metric for parent selection for clocks requiring low jitter
>> (currently just PCM).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> index 81ecd4c..c7ee951 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ struct bcm2835_clock_data {
>>  
>>  	bool is_vpu_clock;
>>  	bool is_mash_clock;
>> +	bool low_jitter;
>>  
>>  	u32 tcnt_mux;
>>  };
>> @@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>  							int parent_idx,
>>  							unsigned long rate,
>>  							u32 *div,
>> -							unsigned long *prate)
>> +							unsigned long *prate,
>> +							unsigned long *avgrate)
>>  {
>>  	struct bcm2835_clock *clock = bcm2835_clock_from_hw(hw);
>>  	struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = clock->cprman;
>> @@ -1136,11 +1138,34 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>  	parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, parent_idx);
>>  
>>  	if (!(BIT(parent_idx) & data->set_rate_parent)) {
>> +		unsigned long tmp_rate;
>> +
>>  		*prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>>  		*div = bcm2835_clock_choose_div(hw, rate, *prate, true);
>>  
>> -		return bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>> -						       *div);
>> +		tmp_rate = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate, *div);
>> +		*avgrate = tmp_rate;
>> +
>> +		if (data->low_jitter && (*div & CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK)) {
>> +			unsigned long high, low;
>> +			u32 int_div = *div & ~CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK;
>> +
>> +			high = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>> +							       int_div);
>> +			int_div += CM_DIV_FRAC_MASK + 1;
>> +			low = bcm2835_clock_rate_from_divisor(clock, *prate,
>> +							      int_div);
>> +
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Return a value which is the maximum deviation
>> +			 * below the ideal rate, for use as a metric.
>> +			 */
>> +			if ((tmp_rate - low) < (high - tmp_rate))
>> +				tmp_rate = low;
>> +			else
>> +				tmp_rate -= high - tmp_rate;
> 
> Simplification suggestion: Remove tmp_rate variable, just assign to
> rate_from_divisor result to *avgrate.  At the end of the low_jitter
> block, just "return *avgrate - max(*avgrate - low, high - *avgrate)".

Yes, I like that.

> With that, feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

Thanks - I will.

Phil

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web