Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1650963 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-26 01:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-30 21:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-05-26 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 21:00 +0200
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 01:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler |
| Message-ID | <tLamB-6m2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
> Tested on ARMv7 with QEMU by me (Shubham Bansal).
> Tested on ARMv5 by Andrew Lunn (andrew@lunn.ch).
> Expected to work on ARMv6 as well, as its a part ARMv7 and part ARMv5.
> Although, a proper testing is not done for ARMv6.
>
> Both of these testing are done with and without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> separately for LITTLE ENDIAN machine.
Nope. I only tested it in the default configuration of mvebu_v5_defconfig.
Please change the 'Both' to 'Some'.
Andrew
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLawi-6pJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1650963 |
Hi Andrew, Oh. I didn't knew. Can you test it now and confirm it? I think it will work and wouldn't take much of the time. Please. Best, Shubham Bansal On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: >> Tested on ARMv7 with QEMU by me (Shubham Bansal). >> Tested on ARMv5 by Andrew Lunn (andrew@lunn.ch). >> Expected to work on ARMv6 as well, as its a part ARMv7 and part ARMv5. >> Although, a proper testing is not done for ARMv6. >> >> Both of these testing are done with and without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER >> separately for LITTLE ENDIAN machine. > > Nope. I only tested it in the default configuration of mvebu_v5_defconfig. > Please change the 'Both' to 'Some'. > > Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLawi-6pJ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1650976 |
Just to add. It a very very small part which deal with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER just one move instruction. Best, Shubham Bansal On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Oh. I didn't knew. Can you test it now and confirm it? I think it will > work and wouldn't take much of the time. > > Please. > Best, > Shubham Bansal > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: >>> Tested on ARMv7 with QEMU by me (Shubham Bansal). >>> Tested on ARMv5 by Andrew Lunn (andrew@lunn.ch). >>> Expected to work on ARMv6 as well, as its a part ARMv7 and part ARMv5. >>> Although, a proper testing is not done for ARMv6. >>> >>> Both of these testing are done with and without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER >>> separately for LITTLE ENDIAN machine. >> >> Nope. I only tested it in the default configuration of mvebu_v5_defconfig. >> Please change the 'Both' to 'Some'. >> >> Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-26 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLqKK-8no-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1650977 |
Hi Andrew, Did you get the time to test the code with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER? It would be great if you could check if it works on ARMv5 so that Russell can look at the patch. Thanks. Best, Shubham Bansal On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to add. It a very very small part which deal with > CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER just one move instruction. > Best, > Shubham Bansal > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Shubham Bansal > <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Oh. I didn't knew. Can you test it now and confirm it? I think it will >> work and wouldn't take much of the time. >> >> Please. >> Best, >> Shubham Bansal >> >> >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: >>>> Tested on ARMv7 with QEMU by me (Shubham Bansal). >>>> Tested on ARMv5 by Andrew Lunn (andrew@lunn.ch). >>>> Expected to work on ARMv6 as well, as its a part ARMv7 and part ARMv5. >>>> Although, a proper testing is not done for ARMv6. >>>> >>>> Both of these testing are done with and without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER >>>> separately for LITTLE ENDIAN machine. >>> >>> Nope. I only tested it in the default configuration of mvebu_v5_defconfig. >>> Please change the 'Both' to 'Some'. >>> >>> Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-30 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tMUx3-2xi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1651522 |
Hi Russell, I tried everything I could to run a ARMv6 machine in last 4 days but I am not able to. If nobody is willing to test the code no there machine, may be we should not merge the code. I have been more than happy to assist anyone who want to test it but it looks like other people don't need it. I guess, it was a wasted effort. I don't have anything more to offer in regarding to this patch. Thank you. Best, Shubham Bansal On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Did you get the time to test the code with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER? It > would be great if you could check if it works on ARMv5 so that Russell > can look at the patch. > > Thanks. > Best, > Shubham Bansal > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Shubham Bansal > <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just to add. It a very very small part which deal with >> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER just one move instruction. >> Best, >> Shubham Bansal >> >> >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Shubham Bansal >> <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> Oh. I didn't knew. Can you test it now and confirm it? I think it will >>> work and wouldn't take much of the time. >>> >>> Please. >>> Best, >>> Shubham Bansal >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: >>>>> Tested on ARMv7 with QEMU by me (Shubham Bansal). >>>>> Tested on ARMv5 by Andrew Lunn (andrew@lunn.ch). >>>>> Expected to work on ARMv6 as well, as its a part ARMv7 and part ARMv5. >>>>> Although, a proper testing is not done for ARMv6. >>>>> >>>>> Both of these testing are done with and without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER >>>>> separately for LITTLE ENDIAN machine. >>>> >>>> Nope. I only tested it in the default configuration of mvebu_v5_defconfig. >>>> Please change the 'Both' to 'Some'. >>>> >>>> Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web