Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1649014 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 6/8] firmware: vpd: do not clear statically allocated data

Started byDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
First post2017-05-24 02:10 +0200
Last post2017-05-24 19:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 6/8] firmware: vpd: do not clear statically allocated data Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 02:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 6/8] firmware: vpd: do not clear statically allocated data Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> - 2017-05-24 19:20 +0200

#1649014 — [PATCH 6/8] firmware: vpd: do not clear statically allocated data

FromDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-24 02:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 6/8] firmware: vpd: do not clear statically allocated data
Message-ID<tKs2e-2wM-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
ro_vpd and rw_vpd are static module-scope variables that are guaranteed
to be initialized with zeroes, there is no need for explicit memset().

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
index 3463b8037ed8..78945729388e 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
@@ -317,9 +317,6 @@ static int __init vpd_platform_init(void)
 	if (!vpd_kobj)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	memset(&ro_vpd, 0, sizeof(ro_vpd));
-	memset(&rw_vpd, 0, sizeof(rw_vpd));
-
 	platform_driver_register(&vpd_driver);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.13.0.219.gdb65acc882-goog

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649788

FromGuenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>
Date2017-05-24 19:20 +0200
Message-ID<tKI70-5bS-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1649014
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> ro_vpd and rw_vpd are static module-scope variables that are guaranteed
> to be initialized with zeroes, there is no need for explicit memset().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>

> ---
>  drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> index 3463b8037ed8..78945729388e 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> @@ -317,9 +317,6 @@ static int __init vpd_platform_init(void)
>         if (!vpd_kobj)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       memset(&ro_vpd, 0, sizeof(ro_vpd));
> -       memset(&rw_vpd, 0, sizeof(rw_vpd));
> -
>         platform_driver_register(&vpd_driver);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.13.0.219.gdb65acc882-goog
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web