Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1648874 > unrolled thread

[block] question about potential null pointer dereference

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [block] question about potential null pointer dereference "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-24 00:00 +0200
    Re: [block] question about potential null pointer dereference Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2017-05-24 14:50 +0200

#1648874 — [block] question about potential null pointer dereference

Hello everybody,

While looking into Coverity ID 1408828 I ran into the following piece  
of code at block/bfq-wf2q.c:542:

542static struct rb_node *bfq_find_deepest(struct rb_node *node)
543{
544        struct rb_node *deepest;
545
546        if (!node->rb_right && !node->rb_left)
547                deepest = rb_parent(node);
548        else if (!node->rb_right)
549                deepest = node->rb_left;
550        else if (!node->rb_left)
551                deepest = node->rb_right;
552        else {
553                deepest = rb_next(node);
554                if (deepest->rb_right)
555                        deepest = deepest->rb_right;
556                else if (rb_parent(deepest) != node)
557                        deepest = rb_parent(deepest);
558        }
559
560        return deepest;
561}

The issue here is that there is a potential NULL pointer dereference  
at line 554, in case function rb_next() returns NULL.

Maybe a patch like the following could be applied in order to avoid  
any chance of a NULL pointer dereference:

index 8726ede..28d8b90 100644
--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ static struct rb_node *bfq_find_deepest(struct  
rb_node *node)
                 deepest = node->rb_right;
         else {
                 deepest = rb_next(node);
+               if (!deepest)
+                       return NULL;
                 if (deepest->rb_right)
                         deepest = deepest->rb_right;
                 else if (rb_parent(deepest) != node)

What do you think?

I'd really appreciate any comment on this.

Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1649585

> Il giorno 23 mag 2017, alle ore 22:52, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 

Hi

> While looking into Coverity ID 1408828 I ran into the following piece of code at block/bfq-wf2q.c:542:
> 
> 542static struct rb_node *bfq_find_deepest(struct rb_node *node)
> 543{
> 544        struct rb_node *deepest;
> 545
> 546        if (!node->rb_right && !node->rb_left)
> 547                deepest = rb_parent(node);
> 548        else if (!node->rb_right)
> 549                deepest = node->rb_left;
> 550        else if (!node->rb_left)
> 551                deepest = node->rb_right;
> 552        else {
> 553                deepest = rb_next(node);
> 554                if (deepest->rb_right)
> 555                        deepest = deepest->rb_right;
> 556                else if (rb_parent(deepest) != node)
> 557                        deepest = rb_parent(deepest);
> 558        }
> 559
> 560        return deepest;
> 561}
> 
> The issue here is that there is a potential NULL pointer dereference at line 554, in case function rb_next() returns NULL.
> 

Can rb_next(node) return NULL, although node is guaranteed to have both
a left and a right child at line 554?

Thanks,
Paolo

> Maybe a patch like the following could be applied in order to avoid any chance of a NULL pointer dereference:
> 
> index 8726ede..28d8b90 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ static struct rb_node *bfq_find_deepest(struct rb_node *node)
>                deepest = node->rb_right;
>        else {
>                deepest = rb_next(node);
> +               if (!deepest)
> +                       return NULL;
>                if (deepest->rb_right)
>                        deepest = deepest->rb_right;
>                else if (rb_parent(deepest) != node)
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> I'd really appreciate any comment on this.
> 
> Thank you!
> --
> Gustavo A. R. Silva
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web