Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1648310 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails.

Started byEnric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
First post2017-05-23 20:10 +0200
Last post2017-05-23 22:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails. Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> - 2017-05-23 20:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails. Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com> - 2017-05-23 22:40 +0200

#1648310 — [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails.

FromEnric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Date2017-05-23 20:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails.
Message-ID<tKmpP-6Mp-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
When request firmware fails, brcmf_ops_sdio_remove is being called and
brcmf_bus freed. In such circumstancies if you do a suspend/resume cycle
the kernel hangs on resume due a NULL pointer dereference in resume
function.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
 - modprobe brcmfmac without the firmware
     brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for brcm/brcmfmac4354-sdio.bin
     failed with error -2
 - do a suspend/resume cycle (echo mem > /sys/power/state)

Protect against the NULL pointer derefence by checking if dev_get_drvdata
returned a valid pointer.

Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
---
I'm not sure about if this is the correct way to fix this but at least it
prevents the kernel to hang. From one side I'm not sure why suspend/resume
functions are called in such case and why the device is not removed from
the bus, from the other side I saw, that others drivers only unregisters
from sdio when the driver is removed so I supose this is the normal behavior.

Cheers,
 Enric

 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index 9b970dc..aa0e7c2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
@@ -1274,14 +1274,16 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
 static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
 	struct sdio_func *func = container_of(dev, struct sdio_func, dev);
 
 	brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter: F%d\n", func->num);
 	if (func->num != SDIO_FUNC_2)
 		return 0;
 
-	brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(sdiodev);
+	if (!bus_if)
+		return 0;
+
+	brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(bus_if->bus_priv.sdio);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1319,4 +1321,3 @@ void brcmf_sdio_exit(void)
 
 	sdio_unregister_driver(&brcmf_sdmmc_driver);
 }
-
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1648559

FromFranky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com>
Date2017-05-23 22:40 +0200
Message-ID<tKoL2-8pv-63@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1648310
Hi Enric,

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@collabora.com> wrote:
> When request firmware fails, brcmf_ops_sdio_remove is being called and
> brcmf_bus freed. In such circumstancies if you do a suspend/resume cycle
> the kernel hangs on resume due a NULL pointer dereference in resume
> function.
>
> Steps to reproduce the problem:
>  - modprobe brcmfmac without the firmware
>      brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for brcm/brcmfmac4354-sdio.bin
>      failed with error -2
>  - do a suspend/resume cycle (echo mem > /sys/power/state)
>
> Protect against the NULL pointer derefence by checking if dev_get_drvdata
> returned a valid pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> ---
> I'm not sure about if this is the correct way to fix this but at least it
> prevents the kernel to hang. From one side I'm not sure why suspend/resume
> functions are called in such case and why the device is not removed from
> the bus, from the other side I saw, that others drivers only unregisters
> from sdio when the driver is removed so I supose this is the normal behavior.
>

Thank you for reporting this. I also think these questions you listed
should be answered before putting the null check in resume routine. I
will dig deeper and share my finding on the thread.

Regards,
Franky

> Cheers,
>  Enric
>
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index 9b970dc..aa0e7c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -1274,14 +1274,16 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -       struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
>         struct sdio_func *func = container_of(dev, struct sdio_func, dev);
>
>         brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter: F%d\n", func->num);
>         if (func->num != SDIO_FUNC_2)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(sdiodev);
> +       if (!bus_if)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(bus_if->bus_priv.sdio);
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -1319,4 +1321,3 @@ void brcmf_sdio_exit(void)
>
>         sdio_unregister_driver(&brcmf_sdmmc_driver);
>  }
> -
> --
> 2.9.3
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web