Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1648310 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-23 20:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-23 22:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails. Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> - 2017-05-23 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails. Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com> - 2017-05-23 22:40 +0200
| From | Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 20:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fix kernel oops on resume when request firmware fails. |
| Message-ID | <tKmpP-6Mp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
When request firmware fails, brcmf_ops_sdio_remove is being called and
brcmf_bus freed. In such circumstancies if you do a suspend/resume cycle
the kernel hangs on resume due a NULL pointer dereference in resume
function.
Steps to reproduce the problem:
- modprobe brcmfmac without the firmware
brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for brcm/brcmfmac4354-sdio.bin
failed with error -2
- do a suspend/resume cycle (echo mem > /sys/power/state)
Protect against the NULL pointer derefence by checking if dev_get_drvdata
returned a valid pointer.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
---
I'm not sure about if this is the correct way to fix this but at least it
prevents the kernel to hang. From one side I'm not sure why suspend/resume
functions are called in such case and why the device is not removed from
the bus, from the other side I saw, that others drivers only unregisters
from sdio when the driver is removed so I supose this is the normal behavior.
Cheers,
Enric
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index 9b970dc..aa0e7c2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
@@ -1274,14 +1274,16 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
struct sdio_func *func = container_of(dev, struct sdio_func, dev);
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter: F%d\n", func->num);
if (func->num != SDIO_FUNC_2)
return 0;
- brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(sdiodev);
+ if (!bus_if)
+ return 0;
+
+ brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(bus_if->bus_priv.sdio);
return 0;
}
@@ -1319,4 +1321,3 @@ void brcmf_sdio_exit(void)
sdio_unregister_driver(&brcmf_sdmmc_driver);
}
-
--
2.9.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKoL2-8pv-63@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1648310 |
Hi Enric,
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@collabora.com> wrote:
> When request firmware fails, brcmf_ops_sdio_remove is being called and
> brcmf_bus freed. In such circumstancies if you do a suspend/resume cycle
> the kernel hangs on resume due a NULL pointer dereference in resume
> function.
>
> Steps to reproduce the problem:
> - modprobe brcmfmac without the firmware
> brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for brcm/brcmfmac4354-sdio.bin
> failed with error -2
> - do a suspend/resume cycle (echo mem > /sys/power/state)
>
> Protect against the NULL pointer derefence by checking if dev_get_drvdata
> returned a valid pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> ---
> I'm not sure about if this is the correct way to fix this but at least it
> prevents the kernel to hang. From one side I'm not sure why suspend/resume
> functions are called in such case and why the device is not removed from
> the bus, from the other side I saw, that others drivers only unregisters
> from sdio when the driver is removed so I supose this is the normal behavior.
>
Thank you for reporting this. I also think these questions you listed
should be answered before putting the null check in resume routine. I
will dig deeper and share my finding on the thread.
Regards,
Franky
> Cheers,
> Enric
>
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index 9b970dc..aa0e7c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -1274,14 +1274,16 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
> struct sdio_func *func = container_of(dev, struct sdio_func, dev);
>
> brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter: F%d\n", func->num);
> if (func->num != SDIO_FUNC_2)
> return 0;
>
> - brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(sdiodev);
> + if (!bus_if)
> + return 0;
> +
> + brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(bus_if->bus_priv.sdio);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1319,4 +1321,3 @@ void brcmf_sdio_exit(void)
>
> sdio_unregister_driver(&brcmf_sdmmc_driver);
> }
> -
> --
> 2.9.3
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web