Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1647519 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-23 02:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-23 13:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 1/7] RISC-V: Top-Level Makefile for riscv{32,64} Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> - 2017-05-23 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/7] RISC-V: Top-Level Makefile for riscv{32,64} Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-05-23 13:40 +0200
| From | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/7] RISC-V: Top-Level Makefile for riscv{32,64} |
| Message-ID | <tK6bn-4ju-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
RISC-V has both 32-bit and 64-bit base ISAs, but they are very similar.
Like some other platforms, we'd like to share one arch directory between
the two of them.
---
Makefile | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 63e10bd4f14a..0606f28cd4fd 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -269,6 +269,14 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
SRCARCH := x86
endif
+# Additional ARCH settings for RISC-V
+ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv32)
+ SRCARCH := riscv
+endif
+ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv64)
+ SRCARCH := riscv
+endif
+
# Additional ARCH settings for sparc
ifeq ($(ARCH),sparc32)
SRCARCH := sparc
--
2.13.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKgkq-2A2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1647519 |
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
> RISC-V has both 32-bit and 64-bit base ISAs, but they are very similar.
> Like some other platforms, we'd like to share one arch directory between
> the two of them.
I think we mainly do the others for backwards-compatibility with ancient
build scripts, and we don't need that here. Instead, you could add one more
line to the 'SUBARCH:=' statement that interprets the uname output.
Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web