Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1648237 > unrolled thread

[PATCH net-next v9 0/5] skb_to_sgvec hardening

Started by"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
First post2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
Last post2017-05-23 18:30 +0200
Articles 9 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH net-next v9 0/5] skb_to_sgvec hardening "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
    [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of  skb_to_sgvec always Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2017-05-24 11:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of  skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-05-24 13:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of  skb_to_sgvec always Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2017-05-24 18:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of  skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-05-24 22:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of  skb_to_sgvec always Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2017-05-24 22:50 +0200
    [PATCH net-next v9 2/5] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/5] skb_to_sgvec hardening "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-05-23 18:30 +0200

#1648237 — [PATCH net-next v9 0/5] skb_to_sgvec hardening

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH net-next v9 0/5] skb_to_sgvec hardening
Message-ID<tKkxI-5uz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
The recent bug with macsec and historical one with virtio have
indicated that letting skb_to_sgvec trounce all over an sglist
without checking the length is probably a bad idea. And it's not
necessary either: an sglist already explicitly marks its last
item, and the initialization functions are diligent in doing so.
Thus there's a clear way of avoiding future overflows.

So, this patchset, from a high level, makes skb_to_sgvec return
a potential error code, and then adjusts all callers to check
for the error code. There are two situations in which skb_to_sgvec
might return such an error:

   1) When the passed in sglist is too small; and
   2) When the passed in skbuff is too deeply nested.

So, the first patch in this series handles the issues with
skb_to_sgvec directly, and the remaining ones then handle the call
sites.

Changes v8->v9:
   - Return correct errno in rxrpc, thanks to feedback from Dave Howells.

Jason A. Donenfeld (5):
  skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow
  ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
  rxrpc: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
  macsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
  virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

 drivers/net/macsec.c     | 13 ++++++++--
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c |  9 +++++--
 include/linux/skbuff.h   |  8 +++---
 net/core/skbuff.c        | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 net/ipv4/ah4.c           |  8 ++++--
 net/ipv4/esp4.c          | 20 +++++++++------
 net/ipv6/ah6.c           |  8 ++++--
 net/ipv6/esp6.c          | 20 +++++++++------
 net/rxrpc/rxkad.c        | 19 ++++++++++----
 9 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1648238 — [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKkxI-5uz-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1648237
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 9320d96a1632..13fbe4b349c2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
 	const unsigned char *dest = ((struct ethhdr *)skb->data)->h_dest;
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
-	unsigned num_sg;
+	int num_sg;
 	unsigned hdr_len = vi->hdr_len;
 	bool can_push;
 
@@ -1177,11 +1177,16 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (can_push) {
 		__skb_push(skb, hdr_len);
 		num_sg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sq->sg, 0, skb->len);
+                if (unlikely(num_sg < 0))
+			return num_sg;
 		/* Pull header back to avoid skew in tx bytes calculations. */
 		__skb_pull(skb, hdr_len);
 	} else {
 		sg_set_buf(sq->sg, hdr, hdr_len);
-		num_sg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len) + 1;
+		num_sg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len);
+		if (unlikely(num_sg < 0))
+			return num_sg;
+		num_sg++;
 	}
 	return virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, num_sg, skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }
-- 
2.13.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649387 — Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

FromSergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Date2017-05-24 11:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKB5w-AM-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1648238
Hello!

On 5/23/2017 7:05 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 9320d96a1632..13fbe4b349c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
>  	const unsigned char *dest = ((struct ethhdr *)skb->data)->h_dest;
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> -	unsigned num_sg;
> +	int num_sg;
>  	unsigned hdr_len = vi->hdr_len;
>  	bool can_push;
>
> @@ -1177,11 +1177,16 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	if (can_push) {
>  		__skb_push(skb, hdr_len);
>  		num_sg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sq->sg, 0, skb->len);
> +                if (unlikely(num_sg < 0))

    Please indent with tabs, like above and below.

> +			return num_sg;
>  		/* Pull header back to avoid skew in tx bytes calculations. */
>  		__skb_pull(skb, hdr_len);
[...]

MBR, Sergei

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649507 — Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2017-05-24 13:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKCNY-1KT-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1649387
I'm shocked this somehow made it into the commit. I wonder how that happened?

Anyway, fixed in my git repo, and will be part of the next series.
(Unless DaveM wants to fix it up trivially when/if he merges this v9,
which would be faster.)

Barring that, does this look good to you? Could I have your signed-off-by?

Regards,
Jason

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649760 — Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

FromSergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Date2017-05-24 18:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKHDX-4Jq-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1649507
On 05/24/2017 02:34 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

> I'm shocked this somehow made it into the commit. I wonder how that happened?

    Sorry for not noticing this when it first appeared.

> Anyway, fixed in my git repo, and will be part of the next series.
> (Unless DaveM wants to fix it up trivially when/if he merges this v9,
> which would be faster.)
>
> Barring that, does this look good to you? Could I have your signed-off-by?

    I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my:

Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>

if you want. :-)

> Regards,
> Jason

MBR, Sergei

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649936 — Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2017-05-24 22:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKLey-72S-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1649760
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
>    I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>
> if you want. :-)

Will do. For the series, or just for 5/5?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649947 — Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

FromSergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Date2017-05-24 22:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKLoe-76t-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1649936
On 05/24/2017 11:39 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

>>    I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>
>> if you want. :-)
>
> Will do. For the series, or just for 5/5?

    5/5 only. :-)

MBR, Sergei

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1648240 — [PATCH net-next v9 2/5] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2017-05-23 18:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH net-next v9 2/5] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always
Message-ID<tKkxI-5uz-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1648237
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 net/ipv4/ah4.c  |  8 ++++++--
 net/ipv4/esp4.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 net/ipv6/ah6.c  |  8 ++++++--
 net/ipv6/esp6.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ah4.c b/net/ipv4/ah4.c
index 22377c8ff14b..e8f862358518 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ah4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ah4.c
@@ -220,7 +220,9 @@ static int ah_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	ah->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.low);
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, nfrags + sglists);
-	skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto out_free;
 
 	if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
 		/* Attach seqhi sg right after packet payload */
@@ -393,7 +395,9 @@ static int ah_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	skb_push(skb, ihl);
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, nfrags + sglists);
-	skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto out_free;
 
 	if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
 		/* Attach seqhi sg right after packet payload */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 65cc02bd82bc..392432860bb9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -374,9 +374,11 @@ int esp_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
 	esp->esph = esph;
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, esp->nfrags);
-	skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg,
-		     (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
-		     assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg,
+		           (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
+		           assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto error;
 
 	if (!esp->inplace) {
 		int allocsize;
@@ -400,9 +402,11 @@ int esp_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
 		spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
 
 		sg_init_table(dsg, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 1);
-		skb_to_sgvec(skb, dsg,
-			     (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
-			     assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+		err = skb_to_sgvec(skb, dsg,
+			           (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
+			           assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+		if (unlikely(err < 0))
+			goto error;
 	}
 
 	if ((x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN))
@@ -687,7 +691,9 @@ static int esp_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	esp_input_set_header(skb, seqhi);
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, nfrags);
-	skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto out;
 
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ah6.c b/net/ipv6/ah6.c
index dda6035e3b84..755f38271dd5 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ah6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ah6.c
@@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ static int ah6_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	ah->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.low);
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, nfrags + sglists);
-	skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto out_free;
 
 	if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
 		/* Attach seqhi sg right after packet payload */
@@ -606,7 +608,9 @@ static int ah6_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	ip6h->hop_limit   = 0;
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, nfrags + sglists);
-	skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec_nomark(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto out_free;
 
 	if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
 		/* Attach seqhi sg right after packet payload */
diff --git a/net/ipv6/esp6.c b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
index 1fe99ba8066c..2ede4e459c4e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/esp6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
@@ -346,9 +346,11 @@ int esp6_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info
 	esph = esp_output_set_esn(skb, x, ip_esp_hdr(skb), seqhi);
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, esp->nfrags);
-	skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg,
-		     (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
-		     assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+	err = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg,
+		           (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
+		           assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+	if (unlikely(err < 0))
+		goto error;
 
 	if (!esp->inplace) {
 		int allocsize;
@@ -372,9 +374,11 @@ int esp6_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info
 		spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
 
 		sg_init_table(dsg, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 1);
-		skb_to_sgvec(skb, dsg,
-			     (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
-			     assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+		err = skb_to_sgvec(skb, dsg,
+			           (unsigned char *)esph - skb->data,
+			           assoclen + ivlen + esp->clen + alen);
+		if (unlikely(err < 0))
+			goto error;
 	}
 
 	if ((x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN))
@@ -618,7 +622,9 @@ static int esp6_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	esp_input_set_header(skb, seqhi);
 
 	sg_init_table(sg, nfrags);
-	skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	ret = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
+	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
+		goto out;
 
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 
-- 
2.13.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1648246

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2017-05-23 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<tKkR3-5Bx-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1648237
Hi List,

Could somebody do a holistic review of the series, or at least on
individual commits that seem fine, and sign off on it, so that this
can actually be merged? We're now at v9. I hope we can get this merged
now, but if not, I'd like for v10 to finally land these changes.

Regards,
Jason

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web