Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1647574 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v5 0/4] Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200
[PATCH v5 4/4] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200
[PATCH v5 2/4] sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 0/4] Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology |
| Message-ID | <tK7qO-5fE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
When cpudl_find() returns any among free_cpus, the cpu might not be
closer than others, considering sched domain. For example:
this_cpu: 15
free_cpus: 0, 1,..., 14 (== later_mask)
best_cpu: 0
topology:
0 --+
+--+
1 --+ |
+-- ... --+
2 --+ | |
+--+ |
3 --+ |
... ...
12 --+ |
+--+ |
13 --+ | |
+-- ... -+
14 --+ |
+--+
15 --+
In this case, it would be best to select 14 since it's a free cpu and
closest to 15(this_cpu). However, currently the code select 0(best_cpu)
even though that's just any among free_cpus. Fix it.
Change from v4
-. remove a patch that might cause huge lock contention
(by spin lock(&cpudl.lock) in a hot path of scheduler)
Change from v3
-. rename closest_cpu to best_cpu so that it align with rt
-. protect referring cpudl.elements with cpudl.lock
-. change return value of cpudl_find() to bool
Change from v2
-. add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING
Change from v1
-. clean up the patch
Byungchul Park (4):
sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology
sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find()
sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq()
sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq()
kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() |
| Message-ID | <tK7qO-5fE-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1647574 |
It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, instead, get more chances to check other
siblings.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 979b734..6332b2ad 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1624,6 +1624,7 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
struct cpumask *lowest_mask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask);
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
int cpu = task_cpu(task);
+ int fallback_cpu = -1;
/* Make sure the mask is initialized first */
if (unlikely(!lowest_mask))
@@ -1671,6 +1672,15 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
best_cpu = cpumask_first_and(lowest_mask,
sched_domain_span(sd));
if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
+ /*
+ * If current domain is SD_PREFER_SIBLING
+ * flaged, we have to get more chances to
+ * check other siblings.
+ */
+ if (sd->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING) {
+ fallback_cpu = best_cpu;
+ continue;
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
return best_cpu;
}
@@ -1679,6 +1689,13 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
+ * If fallback_cpu is valid, all our quesses failed *except* for
+ * SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain. Now, we can return the fallback cpu.
+ */
+ if (fallback_cpu != -1)
+ return fallback_cpu;
+
+ /*
* And finally, if there were no matches within the domains
* just give the caller *something* to work with from the compatible
* locations.
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 2/4] sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find() |
| Message-ID | <tK7qO-5fE-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1647574 |
Currently cpudl_find() returns the best cpu that means it has the
maximum dl, however, the value is already kept in later_mask and the
return value is not referred directly any more.
Now, it's enough to return whether CPUs were found or not, like rt.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index fba235c..7408cbe 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
@@ -119,29 +119,29 @@ static inline int cpudl_maximum(struct cpudl *cp)
* @p: the task
* @later_mask: a mask to fill in with the selected CPUs (or NULL)
*
- * Returns: int - best CPU (heap maximum if suitable)
+ * Returns: (int)bool - CPUs were found
*/
int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
struct cpumask *later_mask)
{
- int best_cpu = -1;
const struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
if (later_mask &&
cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus, &p->cpus_allowed)) {
- best_cpu = cpumask_any(later_mask);
- goto out;
- } else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpudl_maximum(cp), &p->cpus_allowed) &&
- dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, cp->elements[0].dl)) {
- best_cpu = cpudl_maximum(cp);
- if (later_mask)
- cpumask_set_cpu(best_cpu, later_mask);
- }
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ int best_cpu = cpudl_maximum(cp);
+ WARN_ON(best_cpu != -1 && !cpu_present(best_cpu));
-out:
- WARN_ON(best_cpu != -1 && !cpu_present(best_cpu));
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(best_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
+ dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, cp->elements[0].dl)) {
+ if (later_mask)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(best_cpu, later_mask);
- return best_cpu;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 9d997d9..0223694 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* let's hope p can move out.
*/
if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 ||
- cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->curr, NULL) == -1)
+ !cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->curr, NULL))
return;
/*
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
*/
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1 &&
- cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, NULL) != -1)
+ cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, NULL))
return;
resched_curr(rq);
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
* We have to consider system topology and task affinity
* first, then we can look for a suitable cpu.
*/
- if (cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl, task, later_mask) == -1)
+ if (!cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl, task, later_mask))
return -1;
/*
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web