Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1646256 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-21 07:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-21 08:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-21 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> - 2017-05-21 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-21 08:00 +0200
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-21 07:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module |
| Message-ID | <tJrhT-3bg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
John Johansen wrote: > On 11/22/2016 10:31 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Tetsuo Handa wrote: > >> John Johansen wrote: > >>>> In order to minimize the burden of reviewing, this patchset implements > >>>> only functionality of checking program execution requests (i.e. execve() > >>>> system call) using pathnames. I'm planning to add other functionalities > >>>> after this version got included into mainline. You can find how future > >>>> versions of CaitSith will look like at http://caitsith.osdn.jp/ . > >>>> > >>> Thanks I've started working my way through this, but it is going to take > >>> me a while. > >>> > >> > >> Thank you for your time. > > > > May I hear the status? Is there something I can do other than waiting? > > > progressing very slowly, I have some time over the next few days as its a > long weekend here in the US some hopefully I can finish this up > May I hear the status again? On 5th March 2017, a CTF game was held in an event titled "CyberColosseo x SecCon" ( http://2016.seccon.jp/news/#137 ). I gave a simple troubleshooting-like system-analyzing quiz using SSH shell session where operations are restricted by CaitSith. Since the VM will be useful as an example of how to configure CaitSith's policy configuration, I made a downloadable version. http://osdn.jp/frs/redir.php?m=jaist&f=/caitsith/67303/SecCon20170305-CaitSith.zip MD5: 99bad6936d8cdeb37d0d6af99265a2ac This VM is configured for VMware Player 12 / 4 CPUs / 2048MB RAM. An IPv4 address will be assigned upon boot using DHCP service on the host network. SSH username and password are both "caitsith".
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-21 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tJrKV-3Ec-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1646256 |
On 05/20/2017 09:59 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > John Johansen wrote: >> On 11/22/2016 10:31 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >>> Tetsuo Handa wrote: >>>> John Johansen wrote: >>>>>> In order to minimize the burden of reviewing, this patchset implements >>>>>> only functionality of checking program execution requests (i.e. execve() >>>>>> system call) using pathnames. I'm planning to add other functionalities >>>>>> after this version got included into mainline. You can find how future >>>>>> versions of CaitSith will look like at http://caitsith.osdn.jp/ . >>>>>> >>>>> Thanks I've started working my way through this, but it is going to take >>>>> me a while. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you for your time. >>> >>> May I hear the status? Is there something I can do other than waiting? >>> >> progressing very slowly, I have some time over the next few days as its a >> long weekend here in the US some hopefully I can finish this up >> > > May I hear the status again? > Yes, sorry. I just haven't had time too look at it recently. I am sorry that it has been so long. I am just going to have to book a day off and do it. I'll see if I can't get a day next week (getting late but I can try or the following) > > > On 5th March 2017, a CTF game was held in an event titled > "CyberColosseo x SecCon" ( http://2016.seccon.jp/news/#137 ). I gave a > simple troubleshooting-like system-analyzing quiz using SSH shell session > where operations are restricted by CaitSith. > > Since the VM will be useful as an example of how to configure > CaitSith's policy configuration, I made a downloadable version. > > http://osdn.jp/frs/redir.php?m=jaist&f=/caitsith/67303/SecCon20170305-CaitSith.zip > MD5: 99bad6936d8cdeb37d0d6af99265a2ac > > This VM is configured for VMware Player 12 / 4 CPUs / 2048MB RAM. > An IPv4 address will be assigned upon boot using DHCP service on the host network. > SSH username and password are both "caitsith". >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-21 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tJs4i-3Ly-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1646260 |
John Johansen wrote: > On 05/20/2017 09:59 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > John Johansen wrote: > >> On 11/22/2016 10:31 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > >>> Tetsuo Handa wrote: > >>>> John Johansen wrote: > >>>>>> In order to minimize the burden of reviewing, this patchset implements > >>>>>> only functionality of checking program execution requests (i.e. execve() > >>>>>> system call) using pathnames. I'm planning to add other functionalities > >>>>>> after this version got included into mainline. You can find how future > >>>>>> versions of CaitSith will look like at http://caitsith.osdn.jp/ . > >>>>>> > >>>>> Thanks I've started working my way through this, but it is going to take > >>>>> me a while. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your time. > >>> > >>> May I hear the status? Is there something I can do other than waiting? > >>> > >> progressing very slowly, I have some time over the next few days as its a > >> long weekend here in the US some hopefully I can finish this up > >> > > > > May I hear the status again? > > > Yes, sorry. I just haven't had time too look at it recently. I am sorry that > it has been so long. I am just going to have to book a day off and do it. I'll > see if I can't get a day next week (getting late but I can try or the following) No problem. ;-) I assume reviewing a new module takes at least one year. Thank you for remembering.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web